Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help when certificate type is not supported #200

Closed
schiwekM opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Help when certificate type is not supported #200

schiwekM opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed in-discussion This item is being discussed internally. size/l Requires large effort to get changed. type/clarity Something was unclear in the documentation. ua-review Under review by the UA team

Comments

@schiwekM
Copy link

Issue description

Hi colleagues,

the docu page is overall quite helpful - however one thing I stumbled over is, that SF API is not supporting the certificates with a .pem file extension and throws the issue like The format of the provided certificate 'SF_Integration.pem' is not supported. Supported formats are: p12, pfx.

https://answers.sap.com/questions/13980793/sap-btp-destination-using-client-certificate-authe.html explains how to resolve the issue, but I would like to see that either SF directly supports the .pem format or that the docu mentions the workaround and in case the issue shows up.

BR,
Marten

Feedback Type (Optional)

None

Page Title on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

Using Mutual Transport Layer Security (mTLS)

Page URL on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

https://help.sap.com/docs/btp/sap-business-technology-platform/using-mutual-transport-layer-security-mtls

@schiwekM schiwekM changed the title Help when certificate is not understood Help when certificate type is not supported Dec 12, 2023
@nikolasimeonov77 nikolasimeonov77 added type/clarity Something was unclear in the documentation. ua-review Under review by the UA team labels Dec 12, 2023
@nikolasimeonov77
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feedback! We’ll look into it and come back to you if we have any questions.

@ekaterina-mitova
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @schiwekM,
Thank you for you feedback. We will work on updating our documentation and we will forward this issue to the team responsible so the .pem format is added to the supported formats. It may take some time to do that. Once the format is supported, I will update the documentation respectively.

@ekaterina-mitova ekaterina-mitova added follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed in-discussion This item is being discussed internally. labels Dec 13, 2023
@Peteva Peteva added the size/l Requires large effort to get changed. label Jan 16, 2024
@ekaterina-mitova
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @schiwekM,

The documentation is updated now to include not only .pem format but also .p12. See Using Mutual Transport Layer Security (mTLS).

And the .pem format has been added to the supported formats. You can check when it will be released at SAP/cloud-sdk-js#4473.

@schiwekM
Copy link
Author

schiwekM commented Feb 9, 2024

Hi @ekaterina-mitova,
much appreciated for the improved documentation and taking care that cloud sdk supports the format.
Thanks.
BR, Marten

@nikolasimeonov77 nikolasimeonov77 added the contribution Valuable Contribution label Jul 2, 2024
Copy link

sap-doc-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Thank you for your valuable feedback contribution, @schiwekM! So that we can recognize your contribution in the SAP Community, please check your SAP Community user ID (this is a number) in your personal settings page and share it with us in a reply to this comment. Make sure you just include the number in the reply.

Your user ID is displayed as follows:

Change display name for User ID N

where N is your user ID. For example, 53 is the user ID of the user 'qmacro'.

Please note that we are currently refactoring our profile and badge system on the SAP Community, and will start assigning badges again when that's complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution follow-up-with/dev Clarification with development needed in-discussion This item is being discussed internally. size/l Requires large effort to get changed. type/clarity Something was unclear in the documentation. ua-review Under review by the UA team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants