-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added zeroize to blake2_simd #449
Conversation
@tarcieri zeroize's unstable features seem to be angering the inliner ... not sure what you want me to do with this, just let me know what's preferable for the crate's users |
@laudiacay are you talking about these?
The MSRV of |
So should I just remove the 1.41 tests or configure the crate to only zeroize with a feature, and then only run the 1.41 tests without that feature? |
It may be worth to wait for the next breaking release cycle in which we bump MSRV to 1.57. If you absolutely need zeroization for |
Also I don't think that |
I don't need zeroize myself- I'm just a little bored and contributing to this after work for fun. If you have another "good first issue" let me know- tarcieri suggested this one. I'll make it a crate feature, give me a second... :) |
Depending on your knowledge, it could be a good project to migrate the asm-hashes to inline assembly, similarly to #447. Also you could try to implement algorithms as per #1 (you could see other repos for similar issues). |
featurified. Going to go look at the inline assembly one, that should be a fun learning experience, I've only done that in C and solidity before... |
90bf2c8
to
8622938
Compare
This code is much cleaner (although a bit repetitive...). Zeroize added! 🖖