-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed "Blacklist" to "Blocklist" (inclusive language) #552
Conversation
Hi, thanks for the pull request! This concern has been raised about two years ago on crowdin. Back then I decided not to change the term, or at least I left it open for further discussion. Here is what I wrote:
I'm still not convinced that replacing words containing the color black with a negative meaning is the right way to fight discrimination (as long as they are not invented or used for discrimination). However it's a minor change and it doesn't have any real drawbacks, so I'm going for it. There are just some little problems with your PR.
(marked my current favorites bold) I would suggest we proceed the following way. Once we agreed on a term you only change the following files:
Then I will do the remaining code changes + the necessary function that transitions old blacklist entries to the new term. @ledeniz & @Itchiii Which term do you prefer or do you have any other ideas?
Thanks for that, I fixed it on crowdin. |
Reminder to myself: The Wiki and URL should also be changed: https://github.com/Robbendebiene/Gesturefy/wiki |
Thanks for your concerns! And sorry, I didn't know about the crowdin integration. I think the effect of inclusive language is really hard to measure, but since it doesn't really hurt to change it I would say it's the safer bet.
|
I'm of the opinion that it is right and important to research word origins and also to analyze today's associations and, if necessary, to adapt accordingly when people feel discriminated against. As Robbendebiene already wrote, by the change, we have no disadvantage. But I think it will increase the awareness that there are problematic terms (no matter if "blacklist" is one or not).
|
All right then we go with Exclusions/exclusions. |
@ledeniz I just wanted to ask if you still want to work on this pull request?
|
@Robbendebiene done :) (if I didn't mess up.. please check) |
Uhm you still named it "Blocklist" instead of "Exclusions/exclusions" also you don't need to correct the typo in |
This reverts commit ae03e63.
This reverts commit 6c8cec2.
as discussed here Robbendebiene#552 (comment)
Hmm I tried to revert my initial changes and only change the files you listed, but I don't think I succeeded.. I'm not sure if I can complete this cleanly to be honest, I'm very sorry |
@ledeniz Thanks for your effort. This change is now in Gesturefy 3.1.0 |
Hi there,
Since I use Gesturefy extensively I thought it'd be nice to give something back, even if it's just a very small PR like this.
I hope this does not cause any technical difficulties :)
Some time ago I stumbled upon the term "blocklist" as an replacement for "blacklist", which I think is a really elegant switch to a more inclusive term. So I thought maybe it'd be a good idea to include this term in Gesturefy.
I splitted the changes of the two different notations in two seperate commits.
EDIT: I just found a typo in the german translation and added that as well.