drm/amd/amdgpu: fix refcount leak

[ Upstream commit fa7e6ab ] [Why] the gem object rfb->base.obj[0] is get according to num_planes in amdgpufb_create, but is not put according to num_planes [How] put rfb->base.obj[0] in amdgpu_fbdev_destroy according to num_planes Signed-off-by: Jingwen Chen <[email protected]> Acked-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
RoPieee · Jun 3, 2021 · 9fdb8ed · 9fdb8ed
1 parent 07ab4df
commit 9fdb8ed
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fb.c
@@ -289,10 +289,13 @@ static int amdgpufb_create(struct drm_fb_helper *helper,
 static int amdgpu_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev, struct amdgpu_fbdev *rfbdev)
 {
 	struct amdgpu_framebuffer *rfb = &rfbdev->rfb;
+	int i;
 
 	drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi(&rfbdev->helper);
 
 	if (rfb->base.obj[0]) {
+		for (i = 0; i < rfb->base.format->num_planes; i++)
+			drm_gem_object_put(rfb->base.obj[0]);
 		amdgpufb_destroy_pinned_object(rfb->base.obj[0]);
 		rfb->base.obj[0] = NULL;
 		drm_framebuffer_unregister_private(&rfb->base);