Upgrate node version from 8 to 10

[astrozzc]

Link(s) to Jira

Description of Intent of Change(s)

The fs-extra causes failure of buiding openapi. According to this:
google/docsy#265, node version will fix this

Failure message looks like this:
/opt/app-root/src/.npm-global/lib/node_modules/apidoc/node_modules/fs-extra/lib/mkdirs/make-dir.js:85
} catch {
^

SyntaxError: Unexpected token {
at createScript (vm.js:80:10)
at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:139:10)
at Module._compile (module.js:617:28)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:664:10)
at Module.load (module.js:566:32)
at tryModuleLoad (module.js:506:12)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:498:3)
at Module.require (module.js:597:17)
at require (internal/module.js:11:18)
at Object. (/opt/app-root/src/.npm-global/lib/node_modules/apidoc/node_modules/fs-extra/lib/mkdirs/index.js:3:44)
make: *** [gen-apidoc] Error 1

Local Testing

How can the feature be exercised?
How can the bug be exploited and fix confirmed?
Is any special local setup required?

Checklist

• if API spec changes are required, is the spec updated?

• are there any pre/post merge actions required? if so, document here.

• are theses changes covered by unit tests?

• if warranted, are documentation changes accounted for?

• does this require migration changes?

  • if yes, are they backwards compatible?
    Yea, we could easily roll this back

• is there known, direct impact to dependent teams/components?

  • if yes, how will this be handled?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #329 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #329   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    90.8%   90.8%           
======================================
  Files          52      52           
  Lines        2124    2124           
  Branches      277     277           
======================================
  Hits         1928    1928           
  Misses        132     132           
  Partials       64      64           

[wcmitchell]

Seems worth a shot to move past these errors. We can back it out if we notice any negatives, but local testing seems to indicate this will allow the apidocs to be built