-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V2 APIs - Enforce Default Ordering on Views #1491
Open
coderbydesign
wants to merge
5
commits into
RedHatInsights:master
Choose a base branch
from
coderbydesign:RHCLOUD-37534-v2-enforce-default-ordering-on-views
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
V2 APIs - Enforce Default Ordering on Views #1491
coderbydesign
wants to merge
5
commits into
RedHatInsights:master
from
coderbydesign:RHCLOUD-37534-v2-enforce-default-ordering-on-views
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This removes the ordering from the Workspace model. We don't need explicit ordering on every query, just enforcement on the API.
This should vastly improve performance of simple queries against large datasets.
lpichler
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch!
from CI:
but it is not failing for me locally. |
@lpichler Odd! Looks like it's green now, but makes me wonder if there's a flakey test somewhere. I did see in that run it looked like there were some redis errors/warning as well, not sure if it's related. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link(s) to Jira
Description of Intent of Change(s)
Given the number of workspaces we now manage in RBAC, the current implementation of default ordering is not efficient.
Ordering based on
name
andmodified
fields is done in the Meta class of theWorkspace
model [1] which means that all queries (app-wide ORM queries, API views, etc.) will enforce this ordering. Since we only need this ordering enforced on API calls, we should remove this from the model (greatly improving query performance outside the context of views) and push it into our base viewset [2] to be used by all v2 APIs by default.This also changes the current behavior by ensuring
name
ordering is ascending (current behavior) andmodified
ordering is descending to show latest first (a change in current benavior).[1] https://github.com/RedHatInsights/insights-rbac/blob/master/rbac/management/workspace/model.py#L45
[2] https://github.com/RedHatInsights/insights-rbac/blob/master/rbac/management/base_viewsets.py
Local Testing
Changes have been made to call out expected ordering behavior in unit tests. Also, locally you can run manual queries against the
Workspace
model to see the performance difference:In a script, run this against the code prior to and after the change. This is what I observed locally against 1 million workspaces (an almost 400x improvement in query performance):
Before
After
Checklist
Secure Coding Practices Checklist Link
Secure Coding Practices Checklist