-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add more operators to RxScala #1210
Conversation
Conflicts: language-adaptors/rxjava-scala/src/examples/scala/rx/lang/scala/examples/RxScalaDemo.scala
RxJava-pull-requests #1122 SUCCESS |
observer.onNext(calculateElement(0)) | ||
observer.onNext(calculateElement(1)) | ||
observer.onCompleted() | ||
Subscription {} | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you want to change this? Users coming from C# will look for an Observable.create(Observer[T] => Subscription)
example, and they should find something. Even if we completely remove Observable.create one day, I think we should leave this code (maybe commented out).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally agreed; no harm in leaving this in. Also for folks that watch the coursera videos.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Already reverted.
Nice examples in RxScalaDemo :) |
RxJava-pull-requests #1125 SUCCESS |
LGTM |
Conflicts: language-adaptors/rxjava-scala/src/test/scala/rx/lang/scala/CompletenessTest.scala
Add more operators to RxScala
Conflicts against #1178, too. I will rebase once #1178 is merged to master.
/cc @samuelgruetter