-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Functions Utility Methods? #1797
Comments
I use them, I'd vote for keeping them as support for < Java 8 (my work codebase is still at Java 7 and will stay that way till next year sometime). I'm not very interested in |
This has nothing to do with Java 8 vs 7. It's about RxJava not including non-essential functionality. The fact that we accrued a few random utility functions is not reason enough to keep them and sets precedent for adding more (which is generally not wanted). So why should these be kept? They are rarely used and trivial to implant in an application if needed. |
I checked my codebase and I use very little so I'm happy for them to be removed. |
Thanks for the feedback. |
I was using this... but I suppose it is easy enough to roll you own. |
We have unnecessary methods sitting in the
Functions
class. Should we remove them?These set a precedent for including utility methods, but generally we don't want them in RxJava core.
@headinthebox and I think we should remove them. Anyone have a good reason to keep them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: