Deprecate -sequenceMany:, rename -sequenceNext: to -then:

[jspahrsummers]

Fixes #624.

I noticed our +if:then:else: operator while implementing this, and I'm wondering if that might be confusing with -then:. However, they're used in pretty different contexts, and the parameter is of a different type in each case, so I could go either way.

[kastiglione]

I can live with +if:then:else: and -then:.

I have one last idea: -relayTo:. I first thought of it in the relay race sense, but it also has the electrical signal connotation too.

[jspahrsummers]

That's not a bad idea. It sounds pretty esoteric, but maybe that'll force people to read the documentation.

@ReactiveCocoa/reactivecocoa Any other input on the above?

[kastiglione]

maybe that'll force people to read the documentation.

You forgot the

[joshvera]

✋ for -then:

[joshaber]

I'd still lean towards -then: but I'm probably biased

[jspahrsummers]

🚢

[joshaber]

💥