-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EXSWHTEC-106 - Reimplement tests for hipOccupancyMaxActiveBlocksPerMultiprocessor and hipOccupancyMaxPotentialBlockSize APIs #46
Conversation
nives-vukovic
commented
Dec 9, 2022
- Add helper file occupancy_common.hh with parameterized templates
- Expand all positive and negative tests to use the templates
Change-Id: I66f0c09e9c7405ec7430b1883e0e89542fdb87a0
Change-Id: I212b82b1b3a78a368b85ea64e338371a34b405f9
Change-Id: Ib455f72b5be77e1a81137d15c07ea41161b16a3e
Change-Id: Ief96e274f4143e80ceb3e40f04d38ae217777583
Change-Id: I9c03cde09b42c8e3726153c2a177359efc8d6d29
…ltiprocessor and hipOccupancyMaxPotentialBlockSize APIs - Add helper file occupancy_common.hh with parameterized templates - Expand all positive and negative tests to use the templates
}, | ||
blockSize); | ||
|
||
#if HT_NVIDIA // EXSWHTEC-219 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
remove this and use json file. I talked to @mangupta and we just want to avoid the whole test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chrispaquot It has been removed and test has been disabled using json files.
@nives-vukovic |
@rorake Conflicts are resolved. |