Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix classical-bit handling in control-flow StochasticSwap (backport #8906) #8956

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 19, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #8906 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

* Fix classical-bit handling in control-flow StochasticSwap

Previously we were expanding control-flow blocks to be full-width over
_all_ wires, and only contracting the qubits back again, without
changing the clbits given as node arguments.  This modifies the

The changes in most of the tests are necessary because the tests were
testing behaviour that should be considered incorrect.  The principal
new test of all this behaviour is the additional assertions added in
`_visit_block` in the random tests; these uniformly fail without this
patch, and succeed with it.

* Add integration tests of some post-transpile work

These are general integration tests for QPY and OpenQASM 3 dumping, with
a particular emphasis on making sure control-flow constructs don't
invalidate these two operations.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 514e383)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2022 16:31
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@mtreinish mtreinish added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge labels Oct 19, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 4446066 into stable/0.22 Oct 19, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.22/pr-8906 branch October 19, 2022 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants