-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit #8930
Conversation
Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit. This caused loose-bit comparisons to produce false negatives.
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3275508694
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this LGTM, just one tiny nit inline about variable names in the new helper function.
Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>
…8930) * Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit. This caused loose-bit comparisons to produce false negatives. * Improve temporary variable names Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 3bebd0f)
…8930) (#8943) * Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit. This caused loose-bit comparisons to produce false negatives. * Improve temporary variable names Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 3bebd0f) Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <[email protected]>
Summary
Previously, the
condition
of a given operation would not be converted into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit. This caused loose-bit comparisons to produce false negatives.Details and comments