Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit #8930

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

jakelishman
Copy link
Member

Summary

Previously, the condition of a given operation would not be converted into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit. This caused loose-bit comparisons to produce false negatives.

Details and comments

Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted
into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the
rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit.  This caused loose-bit
comparisons to produce false negatives.
@jakelishman jakelishman added stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog labels Oct 17, 2022
@jakelishman jakelishman added this to the 0.22.1 milestone Oct 17, 2022
@jakelishman jakelishman requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2022 18:27
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 17, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3275508694

  • 11 of 11 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • 3 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 84.758%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
qiskit/dagcircuit/dagnode.py 1 88.41%
qiskit/extensions/quantum_initializer/squ.py 2 79.78%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3275440338: -0.003%
Covered Lines: 61936
Relevant Lines: 73074

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@mtreinish mtreinish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall this LGTM, just one tiny nit inline about variable names in the new helper function.

qiskit/dagcircuit/dagnode.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3bebd0f into Qiskit:main Oct 18, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2022
…8930)

* Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit

Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted
into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the
rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit.  This caused loose-bit
comparisons to produce false negatives.

* Improve temporary variable names

Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3bebd0f)
@jakelishman jakelishman deleted the fix-dag-eq-conditions branch October 18, 2022 19:05
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2022
…8930) (#8943)

* Fix single-bit-condition equality in QuantumCircuit and DAGCircuit

Previously, the `condition` of a given operation would not be converted
into bit indices in order do the semantic-equality checking that the
rest of the qargs and cargs get in a circuit.  This caused loose-bit
comparisons to produce false negatives.

* Improve temporary variable names

Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3bebd0f)

Co-authored-by: Jake Lishman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog stable backport potential The bug might be minimal and/or import enough to be port to stable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants