-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch to primitive support in QNSPSA #8682
Conversation
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3156403740
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @ElePT and @woodsp-ibm for pushing this over the finish line! 🙂 |
@Mergifyio requeue |
❌ This pull request head commit has not been previously disembarked from queue. |
* switch to primitive support in QNSPSA * attempt to fix sphinx & cyclic import * add comment about sampler passed positionally * Update typehints * revert import * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: ElePT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ElePT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Steve Wood <[email protected]>
* switch to primitive support in QNSPSA * attempt to fix sphinx & cyclic import * add comment about sampler passed positionally * Update typehints * revert import * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: ElePT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ElePT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Steve Wood <[email protected]>
Summary
Use the Sampler and Fidelity subroutines in
QNSPSA.get_fidelity
instead of the backend and opflow expectation converter. Using the latter now yields a pending deprecation warning.Details and comments
The code also became a lot cleaner since we can now just use the
ComputeUncompute
fidelity instead of computing the overlap manually.I'm not quite sure if this counts as "New Feature" so feel free to untag!