-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove stale note about pending QPY support for SymbolicPulse #8289
Remove stale note about pending QPY support for SymbolicPulse #8289
Conversation
The support for serializing SymbolicPulse objects using QPY was added in PR Qiskit#7300 and has been released as part of 0.21.0. However, the documentation for the SymbolicPulse class had a note saying the QPY support was pending. This was necessary when the SymbolicPulse class was added in Qiskit#7821 because it was unclear when we'd be able to add the QPY support. But, Qiskit#7300 was updated and merged soon after Qiskit#7821, but we neglected to remove that note. This commit corrects the oversight and removes the stale note.
Thank you for opening a new pull request. Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone. One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2609879129
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
The support for serializing SymbolicPulse objects using QPY was added in PR #7300 and has been released as part of 0.21.0. However, the documentation for the SymbolicPulse class had a note saying the QPY support was pending. This was necessary when the SymbolicPulse class was added in #7821 because it was unclear when we'd be able to add the QPY support. But, #7300 was updated and merged soon after #7821, but we neglected to remove that note. This commit corrects the oversight and removes the stale note. Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 47c7c27)
…#8292) The support for serializing SymbolicPulse objects using QPY was added in PR #7300 and has been released as part of 0.21.0. However, the documentation for the SymbolicPulse class had a note saying the QPY support was pending. This was necessary when the SymbolicPulse class was added in #7821 because it was unclear when we'd be able to add the QPY support. But, #7300 was updated and merged soon after #7821, but we neglected to remove that note. This commit corrects the oversight and removes the stale note. Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 47c7c27) Co-authored-by: Matthew Treinish <[email protected]>
Summary
The support for serializing SymbolicPulse objects using QPY was added in
PR #7300 and has been released as part of 0.21.0. However, the
documentation for the SymbolicPulse class had a note saying the QPY
support was pending. This was necessary when the SymbolicPulse class was
added in #7821 because it was unclear when we'd be able to add the QPY
support. But, #7300 was updated and merged soon after #7821, but we
neglected to remove that note. This commit corrects the oversight and
removes the stale note.
Details and comments