Pin ruff==0.5.1
#640
Merged
Pin ruff==0.5.1
#640
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We pin most of our linters, but we have gotten away so far without pinning ruff. However, today CI is broken because the ruff 0.5.2 (patchlevel) release seems to have added a rule. (Or maybe it fixed a rule that was broken before. Either way, it broke us.) From here forward, let's pin ruff, too, and dependabot can propose updating the version from time to time, just as it does with the other linters.
garrison
added
dependencies
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9958124234Details
💛 - Coveralls |
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
We pin most of our linters, but we have gotten away so far without pinning ruff. However, today CI is broken because the ruff 0.5.2 (patchlevel) release seems to have added a rule. (Or maybe it fixed a rule that was broken before. Either way, it broke us.) From here forward, let's pin ruff, too, and dependabot can propose updating the version from time to time, just as it does with the other linters. (cherry picked from commit 250e61a)
garrison
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2024
We pin most of our linters, but we have gotten away so far without pinning ruff. However, today CI is broken because the ruff 0.5.2 (patchlevel) release seems to have added a rule. (Or maybe it fixed a rule that was broken before. Either way, it broke us.) From here forward, let's pin ruff, too, and dependabot can propose updating the version from time to time, just as it does with the other linters. (cherry picked from commit 250e61a) Co-authored-by: Jim Garrison <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We pin most of our linters, but we have gotten away so far without pinning ruff. However, today CI is broken because the ruff 0.5.2 (patchlevel) release seems to have added a rule. (Or maybe it fixed a rule that was broken before. Either way, it broke us.)
From here forward, let's pin ruff, too, and dependabot can propose updating the version from time to time, just as it does with the other linters.