handle throughabouts -- do not announce going through #4333
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
This PR resolves #3142 and resolves #4107. For a quick fix, this PR is walking the road of the most silent instructions possible. So for going through a throughabout, we will not see any instruction in the usual case.
This might result in confusion for strange maneuvers, but I would consider most of these to ne separate issues.
Compare screenshots for examples:
osm-link
going through the roundabout doesn't announce a maneuver. This might be overdoing the
silent
part. Should we go for a separate instruction here as inUse the throughlane
Exits like these make counting exits really confusing. They could use some improvement.
Usually I would expect a normal
exit
to ne on the outside of the roundabout. It would be nice to clarify this through lane here./cc @1ec5
Tasklist