Spelling: Hierachy vs Hierarchy

features/bicycle/access.feature

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on ways
     Background:
         Given the profile "bicycle"
 
-    Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on ways
+    Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierarchy on ways
         Then routability should be
             | highway | access | vehicle | bicycle | bothw |
             |         |        |         |         | x     |

features/bicycle/access_node.feature

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Bike - Access tags on nodes
     Background:
         Given the profile "bicycle"
 
-    Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierachy on nodes
+    Scenario: Bike - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
         Then routability should be
             | node/access | node/vehicle | node/bicycle | node/highway  | bothw |
             |             |              |              |               | x     |

features/car/access.feature

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Car - Restricted access
     Background:
         Given the profile "car"
 
-    Scenario: Car - Access tag hierachy    on ways
+    Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy    on ways
         Then routability should be
             | access | vehicle | motor_vehicle | motorcar | bothw |
             |        |         |               |          | x     |
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Feature: Car - Restricted access
             |        |         | no            | yes      | x     |
             |        |         | yes           | no       |       |
 
-    Scenario: Car - Access tag hierachy on nodes
+    Scenario: Car - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
         Then routability should be
             | node/access | node/vehicle | node/motor_vehicle | node/motorcar | bothw |
             |             |              |                    |               | x     |

features/foot/access.feature

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on ways
     Background:
         Given the profile "foot"
 
-    Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierachy on ways
+    Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierarchy on ways
         Then routability should be
             | highway  | access | foot | bothw |
             | footway  |        |      | x     |

features/foot/access_node.feature

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Feature: Foot - Access tags on nodes
     Background:
         Given the profile "foot"
 
-    Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierachy on nodes
+    Scenario: Foot - Access tag hierarchy on nodes
         Then routability should be
             | node/access | node/foot | bothw |
             |             |           | x     |

profiles/bicycle.lua

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ barrier_whitelist = { [""] = true, ["cycle_barrier"] = true, ["bollard"] = true,
 access_tag_whitelist = { ["yes"] = true, ["permissive"] = true, ["designated"] = true }
 access_tag_blacklist = { ["no"] = true, ["private"] = true, ["agricultural"] = true, ["forestry"] = true }
 access_tag_restricted = { ["destination"] = true, ["delivery"] = true }
-access_tags_hierachy = { "bicycle", "vehicle", "access" }
+access_tags_hierarchy = { "bicycle", "vehicle", "access" }
 cycleway_tags = {["track"]=true,["lane"]=true,["opposite"]=true,["opposite_lane"]=true,["opposite_track"]=true,["share_busway"]=true,["sharrow"]=true,["shared"]=true }
 service_tag_restricted = { ["parking_aisle"] = true }
 restriction_exception_tags = { "bicycle", "vehicle", "access" }
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ function node_function (node, result)
   local highway = node:get_value_by_key("highway")
   local is_crossing = highway and highway == "crossing"
 
-  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierarchy)
   if access and access ~= "" then
     -- access restrictions on crossing nodes are not relevant for
     -- the traffic on the road
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ function way_function (way, result)
   end
 
   -- access
-  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierarchy)
   if access and access_tag_blacklist[access] then
     return
   end

profiles/car.lua

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ barrier_whitelist = { ["cattle_grid"] = true, ["border_control"] = true, ["check
 access_tag_whitelist = { ["yes"] = true, ["motorcar"] = true, ["motor_vehicle"] = true, ["vehicle"] = true, ["permissive"] = true, ["designated"] = true, ["destination"] = true }
 access_tag_blacklist = { ["no"] = true, ["private"] = true, ["agricultural"] = true, ["forestry"] = true, ["emergency"] = true, ["psv"] = true }
 access_tag_restricted = { ["destination"] = true, ["delivery"] = true }
-access_tags_hierachy = { "motorcar", "motor_vehicle", "vehicle", "access" }
+access_tags_hierarchy = { "motorcar", "motor_vehicle", "vehicle", "access" }
 service_tag_restricted = { ["parking_aisle"] = true }
 restriction_exception_tags = { "motorcar", "motor_vehicle", "vehicle" }
 
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ end
 
 function node_function (node, result)
   -- parse access and barrier tags
-  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierarchy)
   if access and access ~= "" then
     if access_tag_blacklist[access] then
       result.barrier = true
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ function way_function (way, result)
   end
 
   -- Check if we are allowed to access the way
-  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierarchy)
   if access_tag_blacklist[access] then
     return
   end

profiles/foot.lua

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ barrier_whitelist = { [""] = true, ["cycle_barrier"] = true, ["bollard"] = true,
 access_tag_whitelist = { ["yes"] = true, ["foot"] = true, ["permissive"] = true, ["designated"] = true  }
 access_tag_blacklist = { ["no"] = true, ["private"] = true, ["agricultural"] = true, ["forestry"] = true }
 access_tag_restricted = { ["destination"] = true, ["delivery"] = true }
-access_tags_hierachy = { "foot", "access" }
+access_tags_hierarchy = { "foot", "access" }
 service_tag_restricted = { ["parking_aisle"] = true }
 ignore_in_grid = { ["ferry"] = true }
 restriction_exception_tags = { "foot" }
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ end
 
 function node_function (node, result)
   local barrier = node:get_value_by_key("barrier")
-  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(node, access_tags_hierarchy)
   local traffic_signal = node:get_value_by_key("highway")
 
   -- flag node if it carries a traffic light
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ function way_function (way, result)
   end
 
   -- access
-  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierachy)
+  local access = find_access_tag(way, access_tags_hierarchy)
   if access_tag_blacklist[access] then
     return
   end

profiles/lib/access.lua

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ local ipairs = ipairs
 
 local Access = {}
 
-function Access.find_access_tag(source,access_tags_hierachy)
-    for i,v in ipairs(access_tags_hierachy) do
+function Access.find_access_tag(source,access_tags_hierarchy)
+    for i,v in ipairs(access_tags_hierarchy) do
         local tag = source:get_value_by_key(v)
         if tag and tag ~= '' then
             return tag

src/extractor/restriction_parser.cpp

@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ bool RestrictionParser::ShouldIgnoreRestriction(const std::string &except_tag_st
     // should this restriction be ignored? yes if there's an overlap between:
     // a) the list of modes in the except tag of the restriction
     //    (except_tag_string), eg: except=bus;bicycle
-    // b) the lua profile defines a hierachy of modes,
+    // b) the lua profile defines a hierarchy of modes,
     //    eg: [access, vehicle, bicycle]
 
     if (except_tag_string.empty())