Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Counting of service exits on service roundabouts #4075

Closed
oxidase opened this issue May 23, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Counting of service exits on service roundabouts #4075

oxidase opened this issue May 23, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@oxidase
Copy link
Contributor

oxidase commented May 23, 2017

OSM has 13150 ways ["highway"="service"]["junction"="roundabout"]; in which service exits will be suppressed and guidance instructions will be "take the 1st exit". Most of the service roundabouts are located in large parking areas like airports or hospitals and guidance can be confusing in these areas.

For http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=18&center=40.479392%2C-3.477795&loc=40.478358%2C-3.479485&loc=40.480883%2C-3.477607&hl=en&alt=0
screenshot from 2017-05-23 11-55-33
the third instruction must be "take the 2bd exit"

In #4073 commit 588563c changed the exits counting, but not related to the PR.

@emiltin
Copy link
Contributor

emiltin commented May 23, 2017

with the current work on roundabouts, keep in mind that roundabout exit instructions are kind of broken for cyclists and pedestrians, eg. #2533. you can of course use serviceroads, and also push against oneways.

here's an example of a roundabout with highway=path on both the roundabout and all exists:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119182066

and a roundabout with a cycleway exit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8131031

@oxidase
Copy link
Contributor Author

oxidase commented May 23, 2017

@emiltin thanks for pointing to the issue for non-car profiles! i will check in scope of this issue, but ignoring service roads on normal roundabouts atm is expected behavior for car profiles. Here http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=19&center=55.739516%2C12.494368&loc=55.739479%2C12.494186&loc=55.739648%2C12.494454&hl=en&alt=0 "the 1st exit" is correct.

Maybe a special handling for cyclists and pedestrians is needed, but i would open an issue after a check.

@emiltin
Copy link
Contributor

emiltin commented May 23, 2017

yes my point is that the current behaviour does not work for foot and bike routing.
even for cars i'm not sure i think the current behaviour makes sense, e.g. in the example no matter what exit you take, you get 'take 1st exit':
http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=19&center=55.739332%2C12.494454&loc=55.739479%2C12.494186&loc=55.739174%2C12.494679&hl=en&alt=0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants