Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insights date filtering/interval logic is confusing #8059

Closed
macobo opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10688
Closed

Insights date filtering/interval logic is confusing #8059

macobo opened this issue Jan 14, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10688
Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature/trends Feature Tag: Trends

Comments

@macobo
Copy link
Contributor

macobo commented Jan 14, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem?

In insights you can select a time range and a group by interval. Combining these can lead to unexpected results.

For example, on Jan 14th selecting "week" interval and 30 days shows dates of 9th of January, 2nd January, 26th December, 19th December and 12th December.

This has couple of issues:

  • Weeks start on Sunday not Monday, which is meh
  • 12th december is over 30 days ago
  • Changing the timerange to 90 days, the result for 12th december increases.

Same applies for e.g. choosing month interval

One combination which is also confusing is last 14 days with month interval.

Another thing is that choosing "last 7 days" shows 8 datapoints on the graph.

Describe the solution you'd like

???

Additional context

This feedback is given from the perspective of trends, but general problems apply everywhere.

Related issue: #8031

cc @paolodamico @EDsCODE

Thank you for your feature request – we love each and every one!

@macobo
Copy link
Contributor Author

macobo commented Jul 4, 2022

@kappa90 was this (plus other linked issues) intentionally closed?

@kappa90
Copy link
Contributor

kappa90 commented Jul 4, 2022

@kappa90 was this (plus other linked issues) intentionally closed?

Sorry, I'm reopening the issues, the original PR was not supposed to be an experiment but rather a fix to these issues. I'm going to close these once the experiment is confirmed. Thanks for pointing this out!

@kappa90
Copy link
Contributor

kappa90 commented Jul 4, 2022

Incorrectly closed after #10462, which is meant to run as an experiment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature/trends Feature Tag: Trends
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants