You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let $R$ be a position vector and $x^i$ be the coordinates of a curvilinear system and $y^j$ those of an orthonormal system.
Then $\hat{y}^j$ can be defined unambiguously
However, DESC assumed it does for all surface computations. (Note that a sufficient condition for the relation to hold is if the basis vectors associated with $y^j$ for all $j$ are orthonormal and constant, which is not true in a cylindrical system.)
After fixing this, here are some of the quantities that significantly differ once corrected.
phi_z it should be just 1 right? Are the x arrays the corrected (on your PR) values and the y array the current values in master? EDIT: ah I see that they are, ok good catch
Let$R$ be a position vector and $x^i$ be the coordinates of a curvilinear system and $y^j$ those of an orthonormal system.$\hat{y}^j$ can be defined unambiguously
Then
Now, the relation below does not follow (hence the$\neq$ )
However, DESC assumed it does for all surface computations. (Note that a sufficient condition for the relation to hold is if the basis vectors associated with$y^j$ for all $j$ are orthonormal and constant, which is not true in a cylindrical system.)
After fixing this, here are some of the quantities that significantly differ once corrected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: