Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce additional Multimap Refaster rules #971

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2024

Conversation

Stephan202
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 commented Jan 13, 2024

Suggested commit messages:

Introduce additional `Multimap` Refaster rules (#971)

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Jan 13, 2024
Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

Copy link
Contributor

@mohamedsamehsalah mohamedsamehsalah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cleaner 🧹

@Stephan202 Stephan202 force-pushed the sschroevers/additional-multimap-refaster-rules branch from 67e3bb8 to fbc22dc Compare January 13, 2024 20:23
@rickie rickie force-pushed the sschroevers/additional-multimap-refaster-rules branch from fbc22dc to 72e3597 Compare January 14, 2024 18:22
Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@rickie rickie merged commit 6222bcb into master Jan 14, 2024
16 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the sschroevers/additional-multimap-refaster-rules branch January 14, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants