Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade AssertJ 3.25.0 -> 3.25.1 #949

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2024
Merged

Upgrade AssertJ 3.25.0 -> 3.25.1 #949

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2024

Conversation

Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
AssertJ (source) import patch 3.25.0 -> 3.25.1

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-Bot commented Jan 3, 2024

cody-christmas-banner

The Java Platform team wishes you a happy festive period. Here is the suggested commit message:

Upgrade AssertJ 3.25.0 -> 3.25.1 (#949)

See:
- https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases/tag/assertj-build-3.25.1
- https://github.com/assertj/assertj/compare/assertj-build-3.25.0...assertj-build-3.25.1
Renovate be like

image
Header generated and modified from Sweaterify.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Jan 3, 2024
@rickie rickie merged commit 0ec8ebe into master Jan 3, 2024
16 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/assertj-3.x branch January 3, 2024 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants