Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom 2.15.0 -> 2.15.1 #631

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2023

Conversation

Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom import patch 2.15.0 -> 2.15.1

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-Bot commented May 17, 2023

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Jackson 2.15.0 -> 2.15.1 (#631)

See:
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.15.1
- https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-bom/compare/jackson-bom-2.15.0...jackson-bom-2.15.1

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Member

@Badbond Badbond left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An unexpected review appears. Tweaked the suggested commit message.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.12.0 milestone May 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tweaked the suggested commit message once more ;)

@rickie rickie merged commit 7b71e4e into master May 17, 2023
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson-jackson-bom-2.x branch May 17, 2023 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants