Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Google Java Format 1.16.0 -> 1.17.0 #611

Merged

Conversation

Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format compile minor 1.16.0 -> 1.17.0

Release Notes

google/google-java-format

v1.17.0

Compare Source

Changes

  • Fix compatibility with OpenJDK 21 early access builds (#​898)

Full Changelog: google/google-java-format@v1.16.0...v1.17.0


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-Bot commented May 3, 2023

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Google Java Format 1.16.0 -> 1.17.0 (#611)

See:
- https://github.com/google/google-java-format/releases/tag/v1.17.0
- https://github.com/google/google-java-format/compare/v1.16.0...v1.17.0

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2023

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/com.google.googlejavaformat-google-java-format-1.x branch from a925f82 to 9ac2548 Compare May 3, 2023 07:44
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2023

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@rickie
Copy link
Member

rickie commented May 4, 2023

@Stephan202 do you approve :)?

@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/com.google.googlejavaformat-google-java-format-1.x branch from 9ac2548 to d44c02d Compare May 4, 2023 06:07
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2023

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.10.0 milestone May 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do ;)

@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/com.google.googlejavaformat-google-java-format-1.x branch from d44c02d to 30bdc05 Compare May 4, 2023 07:18
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2023

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 4, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@rickie rickie merged commit 760b1dd into master May 4, 2023
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/com.google.googlejavaformat-google-java-format-1.x branch May 4, 2023 07:53
@rickie rickie changed the title Upgrade com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format 1.16.0 -> 1.17.0 Upgrade Google Java Format 1.16.0 -> 1.17.0 May 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants