Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.8 -> 0.8.9 #565

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2023

Conversation

Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin (source) build patch 0.8.8 -> 0.8.9

Release Notes

jacoco/jacoco

v0.8.9: 0.8.9

Compare Source

New Features

  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 19 and 20 (GitHub #​1371, #​1386).
  • Experimental support for Java 21 class files (GitHub #​1386).
  • Add parameter to include the current project in the report-aggregate Maven goal (GitHub #​1007).
  • Component accessors generated by the Java compilers for records are filtered out during generation of report. Contributed by Tesla Zhang (GitHub #​1393).

Fixed bugs

  • Agent should not open java.lang package to unnamed module of the application class loader (GitHub #​1334).

Non-functional Changes


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-Bot commented Apr 5, 2023

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.8 -> 0.8.9 (#565)

See:
- https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/releases/tag/v0.8.9
- https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/compare/v0.8.8...v0.8.9

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.10.0 milestone Apr 5, 2023
@rickie rickie changed the title Upgrade org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.8 -> 0.8.9 Upgrade jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.8 -> 0.8.9 Apr 5, 2023
@rickie rickie merged commit b0f99e7 into master Apr 5, 2023
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/org.jacoco-jacoco-maven-plugin-0.x branch April 5, 2023 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants