Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade OpenRewrite 2.23.1 -> 2.23.2 #1469

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
OpenRewrite import patch 2.23.1 -> 2.23.2

Release Notes

openrewrite/rewrite-recipe-bom (OpenRewrite)

v2.23.2: 2.23.2

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-recipe-bom


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-DevPla-Bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade OpenRewrite 2.23.1 -> 2.23.2 (#1469)

See:
- https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-recipe-bom/releases/tag/v2.23.2
- https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite-recipe-bom/compare/v2.23.1...v2.23.2

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@Stephan202
Copy link
Member

Output unchanged.

@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/openrewrite-2.x branch from d9ceca9 to d7a0c35 Compare December 20, 2024 07:52
Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@rickie
Copy link
Member

rickie commented Dec 20, 2024

Again Jitpack 😢 , re-triggering.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 merged commit f69fef2 into master Dec 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@Stephan202 Stephan202 deleted the renovate/openrewrite-2.x branch December 20, 2024 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants