Introduce ExplicitArgumentEnumeration check

error-prone-contrib/pom.xml

@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@
             <artifactId>value-annotations</artifactId>
             <scope>test</scope>
         </dependency>
+        <dependency>
+            <groupId>org.jooq</groupId>
+            <artifactId>jooq</artifactId>
+            <scope>provided</scope>
+        </dependency>
         <dependency>
             <groupId>org.jspecify</groupId>
             <artifactId>jspecify</artifactId>

error-prone-contrib/src/main/java/tech/picnic/errorprone/bugpatterns/ExplicitArgumentEnumeration.java

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+package tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns;
+
+import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;
+import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.LinkType.CUSTOM;
+import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.SeverityLevel.SUGGESTION;
+import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.StandardTags.PERFORMANCE;
+import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.StandardTags.SIMPLIFICATION;
+import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.anyOf;
+import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.instanceMethod;
+import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.staticMethod;
+import static tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.Documentation.BUG_PATTERNS_BASE_URL;
+
+import com.google.auto.service.AutoService;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableCollection;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMultiset;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableTable;
+import com.google.errorprone.BugPattern;
+import com.google.errorprone.VisitorState;
+import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.BugChecker;
+import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.BugChecker.MethodInvocationTreeMatcher;
+import com.google.errorprone.fixes.SuggestedFix;
+import com.google.errorprone.fixes.SuggestedFixes;
+import com.google.errorprone.matchers.Description;
+import com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matcher;
+import com.google.errorprone.util.ASTHelpers;
+import com.sun.source.tree.ExpressionTree;
+import com.sun.source.tree.MethodInvocationTree;
+import com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol.MethodSymbol;
+import com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol.VarSymbol;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.Set;
+import tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.SourceCode;
+
+/**
+ * A {@link BugChecker} that flags single-argument method invocations with an iterable of explicitly
+ * enumerated values, for which a semantically equivalent varargs variant (appears to) exists as
+ * well.
+ *
+ * <p>This check drops selected {@link ImmutableSet#of} and {@link Set#of} invocations, with the
+ * assumption that these operations do not deduplicate the collection of explicitly enumerated
+ * values. It also drops {@link ImmutableMultiset#of} and {@link Set#of} invocations, with the
+ * assumption that these do not materially impact iteration order.
+ *
+ * <p>This checker attempts to identify {@link Iterable}-accepting methods for which a varargs
+ * overload exists, and suggests calling the varargs overload instead. This is an imperfect
+ * heuristic, but it e.g. allows invocations of <a
+ * href="https://immutables.github.io/immutable.html#copy-methods">Immutables-generated {@code
+ * with*}</a> methods to be simplified.
+ */
+@AutoService(BugChecker.class)
+@BugPattern(
+    summary = "Iterable creation can be avoided by using a varargs alternative method",
+    link = BUG_PATTERNS_BASE_URL + "ExplicitArgumentEnumeration",
+    linkType = CUSTOM,
+    severity = SUGGESTION,
+    tags = {PERFORMANCE, SIMPLIFICATION})
+public final class ExplicitArgumentEnumeration extends BugChecker
+    implements MethodInvocationTreeMatcher {
+  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
+  private static final Matcher<ExpressionTree> EXPLICIT_ITERABLE_CREATOR =
+      anyOf(
+          staticMethod()
+              .onClassAny(
+                  ImmutableList.class.getCanonicalName(),
+                  ImmutableMultiset.class.getCanonicalName(),
+                  ImmutableSet.class.getCanonicalName(),
+                  List.class.getCanonicalName(),
+                  Set.class.getCanonicalName())
+              .named("of"),
+          staticMethod().onClass(Arrays.class.getCanonicalName()).named("asList"));
+  private static final Matcher<ExpressionTree> IMMUTABLE_COLLECTION_BUILDER =
+      instanceMethod().onDescendantOf(ImmutableCollection.Builder.class.getCanonicalName());
+  private static final Matcher<ExpressionTree> OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT =
+      instanceMethod().onDescendantOf("org.assertj.core.api.ObjectEnumerableAssert");
+  private static final Matcher<ExpressionTree> STEP_VERIFIER_STEP =
+      instanceMethod().onDescendantOf("reactor.test.StepVerifier.Step");
+  private static final ImmutableTable<Matcher<ExpressionTree>, String, String> ALTERNATIVE_METHODS =
+      ImmutableTable.<Matcher<ExpressionTree>, String, String>builder()
+          .put(IMMUTABLE_COLLECTION_BUILDER, "addAll", "add")
+          .put(OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT, "containsAnyElementsOf", "containsAnyOf")
+          .put(OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT, "containsAll", "contains")
+          .put(OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT, "containsExactlyElementsOf", "containsExactly")
+          .put(
+              OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT,
+              "containsExactlyInAnyOrderElementsOf",
+              "containsExactlyInAnyOrder")
+          .put(OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT, "doesNotContainAnyElementsOf", "doesNotContain")
+          .put(OBJECT_ENUMERABLE_ASSERT, "hasSameElementsAs", "containsOnly")
+          .put(STEP_VERIFIER_STEP, "expectNextSequence", "expectNext")
+          .build();
+
+  /** Instantiates a new {@link ExplicitArgumentEnumeration} instance. */
+  public ExplicitArgumentEnumeration() {}
+
+  @Override
+  public Description matchMethodInvocation(MethodInvocationTree tree, VisitorState state) {
+    if (tree.getArguments().size() != 1) {
+      return Description.NO_MATCH;
+    }
+
+    MethodSymbol method = ASTHelpers.getSymbol(tree);
+    if (!isUnaryIterableAcceptingMethod(method, state)) {
+      return Description.NO_MATCH;
+    }
+
+    ExpressionTree argument = tree.getArguments().get(0);
+    if (!(argument instanceof MethodInvocationTree)
+        || !EXPLICIT_ITERABLE_CREATOR.matches(argument, state)) {
+      return Description.NO_MATCH;
+    }
+
+    return trySuggestCallingVarargsOverload(method, (MethodInvocationTree) argument, state)
+        .or(() -> trySuggestCallingCustomAlternative(tree, (MethodInvocationTree) argument, state))
+        .map(fix -> describeMatch(tree, fix))
+        .orElse(Description.NO_MATCH);
+  }
+
+  private static boolean isUnaryIterableAcceptingMethod(MethodSymbol method, VisitorState state) {
+    List<VarSymbol> params = method.params();
+    return !method.isVarArgs()
+        && params.size() == 1
+        && ASTHelpers.isSubtype(params.get(0).type, state.getSymtab().iterableType, state);
+  }
+
+  private static Optional<SuggestedFix> trySuggestCallingVarargsOverload(
+      MethodSymbol method, MethodInvocationTree argument, VisitorState state) {
+    ImmutableList<MethodSymbol> overloads =
+        ASTHelpers.matchingMethods(
+                method.getSimpleName(),
+                m -> m.isPublic() && !m.equals(method),
+                method.enclClass().type,
+                state.getTypes())
+            .collect(toImmutableList());
+
+    /*
+     * If all overloads have a single parameter, and at least one of them is a varargs method, then
+     * we assume that unwrapping the iterable argument will cause a suitable overload to be invoked.
+     * (Note that there may be multiple varargs overloads, either with different parameter types, or
+     * due to method overriding; this check is does not attempt to determine which exact method or
+     * overload will be invoked as a result of the suggested simplification.)
+     *
+     * Note that this is a (highly!) imperfect heuristic, but it is sufficient to prevent e.g.
+     * unwrapping of arguments to `org.jooq.impl.DSL#row`, which can cause the expression's return
+     * type to change from `RowN` to (e.g.) `Row2`.
+     */
+    // XXX: There are certainly cases where it _would_ be nice to unwrap the arguments to
+    // `org.jooq.impl.DSL#row(Collection<?>)`. Look into this.
+    // XXX: Ideally we do check that one of the overloads accepts the unwrapped arguments.
+    // XXX: Ideally we validate that eligible overloads have compatible return types.
+    boolean hasLikelySuitableVarargsOverload =
+        overloads.stream().allMatch(m -> m.params().size() == 1)
+            && overloads.stream().anyMatch(MethodSymbol::isVarArgs);
+
+    return hasLikelySuitableVarargsOverload
+        ? Optional.of(SourceCode.unwrapMethodInvocation(argument, state))
+        : Optional.empty();
+  }
+
+  private static Optional<SuggestedFix> trySuggestCallingCustomAlternative(
+      MethodInvocationTree tree, MethodInvocationTree argument, VisitorState state) {
+    return ALTERNATIVE_METHODS.rowMap().entrySet().stream()
+        .filter(e -> e.getKey().matches(tree, state))
+        .findFirst()
+        .flatMap(e -> trySuggestCallingCustomAlternative(tree, argument, state, e.getValue()));
+  }
+
+  private static Optional<SuggestedFix> trySuggestCallingCustomAlternative(
+      MethodInvocationTree tree,
+      MethodInvocationTree argument,
+      VisitorState state,
+      Map<String, String> alternatives) {
+    String name = ASTHelpers.getSymbol(tree).getSimpleName().toString();
+    String alternative = alternatives.get(name);
+
+    if (alternative == null) {
+      return Optional.empty();
+    }
+
+    SuggestedFix fix = SourceCode.unwrapMethodInvocation(argument, state);
+    return Optional.of(
+        alternative.equals(name)
+            ? fix
+            : SuggestedFix.builder()
+                .merge(SuggestedFixes.renameMethodInvocation(tree, alternative, state))
+                .merge(fix)
+                .build());
+  }
+}