Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let users import from pennylane_qiskit #593

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

austingmhuang
Copy link
Contributor

@austingmhuang austingmhuang commented Oct 29, 2024

In the documentation for qiskit_session and the demo for using IBM with pennylane-qiskit, we import qiskit_session using from pennylane_qiskit import qiskit_session. But this doesn't actually work because it is not in __init__.py.

[sc-77085]

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (fad15a1) to head (3fcde17).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #593   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            9         9           
  Lines          867       868    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits           867       868    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@CatalinaAlbornoz CatalinaAlbornoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

@austingmhuang austingmhuang merged commit cd19f18 into master Oct 29, 2024
10 checks passed
@austingmhuang austingmhuang deleted the fix_qiskit_session_import branch October 29, 2024 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants