Add validate_wires_against_backend function #335
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @JMuff22! Apologies we didn't provide feedback sooner. Do you no longer thing these proposed changes are needed? |
|
Hi @trbromley thanks for the response. The changes are still needed however I was not willing to try to figure out why the CI tests were not working. I am happy and will continue with the current solution however it would be great if pennylane-qiskit could be compatible with BackendV1 objects and BackendV2 objects. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #332
Add a function that allows for both
backend.num_qubitsto be used in addition tobackend.configuration().n_qubitswhich allows usage on both BackendV1 objects and BackendV2 objects which don't support backwards compatibility.