Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider avoiding feature version in spring boot starter name #459

Closed
snicoll opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider avoiding feature version in spring boot starter name #459

snicoll opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@snicoll
Copy link

snicoll commented Aug 8, 2019

We've seen users in the community building 3rd party starters struggling how to prepare the migration to Spring Boot 2 and one way to handle both Spring Boot 1.x and 2.x for the same version was to create a separate starter with Spring Boot 2 in its name.

Spring Boot 1.x is now EOL so I suggest dropping support for it and use the opportunity to remove the second starter. In the future, I'd suggest applying this naming recommendation.

ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
@ebussieres ebussieres added this to the 3.0.11 milestone Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
ebussieres added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
@ebussieres
Copy link
Member

Gonna be changed in next release.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants