Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use UDVT instead of structs for typed library #92

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Use UDVT instead of structs for typed library #92

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Amxx
Copy link
Contributor

@Amxx Amxx commented Jun 2, 2022

UDVT feels like a better option then struct for typed fixed point arithmetic.

This would allow setting global "using for" and soon operator overloading

@PaulRBerg
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Amxx, thanks so much for working on this and creating this PR, but I have already implemented user-defined value types on the staging branch.

I will include this in the PRBMath V3 release.

@PaulRBerg PaulRBerg closed this Jun 2, 2022
@PaulRBerg
Copy link
Owner

Update for future visitors: PRBMath v3.0.0 is now live, which means that PRBMath has support for user defined value types 🥳

@Amxx Amxx deleted the refactor/udvt branch February 23, 2023 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Amxx @PaulRBerg