-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
228 add rule audit comment #229
228 add rule audit comment #229
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
🎉 Thanks for opening this pull request! We really appreciate contributors like you! 🙌 |
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
…into 228-add-rule-audit-comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please rebase on develop
and recreate your local dev virtualenv with pipenv --rm && pipenv install --dev
. The CI problems should be resolved now. There were leftover Ansible packages in Pipfile.lock from before they changed names.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
…-os-ansible into 228-add-rule-audit-comment
Signed-off-by: Stephen Steiner <[email protected]>
## [2.7.0](v2.6.0...v2.7.0) (2021-07-20) ### Features * **panos_email_server:** Add protocol ([#231](#231)) ([b4a0b1a](b4a0b1a)) * **panos_import:** Support import to template ([#225](#225)) ([82db7fe](82db7fe)) * **panos_security_rule:** Add audit comment ([#229](#229)) ([bae2483](bae2483)), closes [#228](#228) * **panos_tag_object:** Add new colors ([#111](#111)) ([#234](#234)) ([1703f29](1703f29)) * Add httpapi connection ([#223](#223)) ([5d11cfc](5d11cfc)) * Add panos_config_element ([be878d4](be878d4)), closes [#219](#219) ### Bug Fixes * **panos_facts:** Fix IPv6 on subinterfaces ([#218](#218)) ([51e1f55](51e1f55))
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.7.0 🎉 The release is available on Ansible Galaxy and GitHub release
|
Description
Adds the ability to provide an audit comment with a rule creation
Motivation and Context
Brings feature parity with a new feature added to the underlying pan-os-python lib
How Has This Been Tested?
Local test playbook
Types of changes
Checklist
Playbook run passes, but
sanity
test throws a lot of module errors that don't seem to be related to changes I've made. Full output is here. Any help is appreciated!PS. Please squash my ugly commit history on merge. :-)