fix postgres test env file, remove sign up confirm password input #2858
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses multiple configuration and dependency updates across various files. The changes include removing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json(1 hunks)docker/api.Containerfile(1 hunks)envFiles/.env.devcontainer(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)schema.graphql(0 hunks)src/graphql/inputs/MutationSignUpInput.ts(0 hunks)test/routes/graphql/Mutation/signUp.test.ts(0 hunks)test/routes/graphql/gql.tada-cache.d.ts(1 hunks)test/routes/graphql/gql.tada.d.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- schema.graphql
- src/graphql/inputs/MutationSignUpInput.ts
- test/routes/graphql/Mutation/signUp.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
package.json
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Requires 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/routes/graphql/gql.tada-cache.d.ts (2)
Line range hint
94-94: LGTM! Input type definition is complete and well-structured.The
MutationSignUpInputtype maintains all necessary fields for user registration while removing the redundant password confirmation.
14-14: LGTM! Schema changes align with PR objectives.The removal of the
confirmedPasswordfield from theMutation_signUptype definition is consistent with the PR's goal to simplify the sign-up process.Let's verify that this change is consistent across the schema:
✅ Verification successful
Verification successful: confirmedPassword field completely removed
The schema changes are consistent across the codebase with no remaining references to the
confirmedPasswordfield in any GraphQL schemas or related files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to confirmedPassword in schema files # Expect: No occurrences of confirmedPassword in schema definitions # Search for confirmedPassword in schema files rg -i "confirmedPassword" --type graphqlLength of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find potential GraphQL schema files echo "=== Finding GraphQL files ===" fd -e graphql -e gql echo -e "\n=== Searching for confirmedPassword ===" # Use regular grep since we know exact files to search fd -e graphql -e gql -x grep -i "confirmedPassword" {} \; # Also search in TypeScript/JavaScript files that might contain GraphQL echo -e "\n=== Searching in TS/JS files ===" rg -t ts -t js "confirmedPassword"Length of output: 378
test/routes/graphql/gql.tada.d.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Skipping review of identical file.This file is identical to
gql.tada-cache.d.tsand contains the same schema changes..devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)
73-73:⚠️ Potential issueSensitive file modification requires approval.
This change modifies a sensitive file and requires the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed according to the pipeline failure.
Additionally, removing
pnpm push_drizzle_schemafrom the post-create command might affect database schema synchronization. Please verify if this removal is intentional and won't impact the development environment setup.package.json (1)
9-10:⚠️ Potential issueSensitive file modification requires approval.
The package.json updates require the 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed. However, the changes appear to be routine dependency updates with minor version bumps.
Let's verify the compatibility of these updates:
Also applies to: 17-17, 26-26, 38-40, 45-45, 49-49, 54-54, 66-66
✅ Verification successful
Package updates verified as safe routine maintenance
The package.json changes are minor version updates to secure versions:
- fastify: ^5.2.1 (well above last vulnerable version 4.10.2)
- @fastify/jwt: ^9.0.3 (no known vulnerabilities)
- @fastify/rate-limit: ^10.2.2
While this is a sensitive file, the changes are routine dependency updates with no security implications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any known vulnerabilities in the updated packages gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NPM, package: "fastify") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange } } }'Length of output: 1211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Fastify version and related package versions cat package.json | jq '.dependencies | .["fastify"], .["@fastify/jwt"], .["@fastify/rate-limit"]' # Check for vulnerabilities in specific packages gh api graphql -f query=' { securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@fastify/jwt") { nodes { advisory { summary severity publishedAt } vulnerableVersionRange } } }'Length of output: 419
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] Unauthorized changes detected in sensitive file. Requires 'ignore-sensitive-files-pr' label to proceed.
docker/api.Containerfile (1)
43-43: LGTM: Consistent Node.js version update.The update to
node:22.13.0-bookworm-slimaligns with the Node.js engine requirement in package.json.
| @@ -89,5 +89,5 @@ POSTGRES_TEST_MAPPED_PORT=5433 | |||
| ########## docker compose ########## | |||
|
|
|||
| COMPOSE_FILE=./compose.yaml:./docker/compose.testing.yaml:./docker/compose.devcontainer.yaml | |||
| COMPOSE_PROFILES=api,caddy,cloudbeaver,minio,minio_test,postgres,postgres-test | |||
| COMPOSE_PROFILES=api,caddy,cloudbeaver,minio,minio_test,postgres,postgres_test | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The service is defined as postgres-test (with hyphen) in Docker Compose files, but COMPOSE_PROFILES uses postgres_test (with underscore). This mismatch should be fixed:
docker/compose.testing.yaml: Usespostgres-testdocker/compose.devcontainer.yaml: Usespostgres-testenvFiles/.env.devcontainer: Usespostgres_test
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Fix for postgres test environment configuration.
The change from postgres-test to postgres_test in COMPOSE_PROFILES aligns with the PR objective to fix the PostgreSQL test database configuration.
Let's verify the consistency of this naming convention:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the service name matches in Docker Compose files
rg -l 'postgres[-_]test' docker/compose.*.yaml
Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the actual service definitions
rg -A 5 'postgres[-_]test:' docker/compose.*.yaml
Length of output: 2259
palisadoes
merged commit 3e1922e
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
…lisadoesFoundation#2858) * fix postgres test devcontainer env file * remove confirmed password sign up input
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix, feature
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Fixed the issue for postgres test database where incorrect corresponding docker service name was provided through the
.env.developmentfile.Removed the
confirmedPasswordinput check as it is a UX concern.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Dependency Updates
Changes
Chores