correcting password of super-admin #2825
Conversation
…ansh-talawa-api into api_fail_docker merge# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
WalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
sample_data/users.json (1)
Line range hint
1-650: Best Practice: Improve sample data structureThe sample data could be improved to better reflect real-world scenarios and make testing more robust:
- Users have identical passwords
- All users have the same creation timestamp
- Some users have null values (e.g., appUserProfileId for the last user)
Consider:
- Using different timestamps for user creation
- Ensuring no null values in required fields
- Adding comments to explain the purpose of each user type
- Including more varied test scenarios (e.g., users with different statuses, different organization memberships)
Would you like me to help create a more diverse and realistic sample dataset?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
sample_data/users.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
sample_data/users.json (1)
Line range hint
1-650: Verify the impact of password changesThe changes modify the password hash for the super-admin account. Let's verify:
- If this is the only instance of the super-admin credentials
- If there are any tests that might be affected by this change
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to search for test files and verify the password hash usage.
Let me check the content of the test file to understand how the super-admin credentials are used.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
✓ Password change in sample data is safe to proceed
The password hash modification in
sample_data/users.jsonappears to be safe as:
- The file is only used as sample/test data
- The super-admin email is only referenced in:
INSTALLATION.mdas documentationtests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.tsfor testing query filterssample_data/users.jsonas sample data- No actual authentication tests depend on the specific password hash
- The password hash is not referenced anywhere else in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of super-admin credentials or password hashes echo "Searching for other instances of super-admin email..." rg "[email protected]" --type-not json echo "Searching for other instances of the password hash..." rg "\$2a\$12\$bSYpay6TRMpTOaAmYPFXku4avwmqfFBtmgg39TabxmtFEiz4plFtW" --type-not json echo "Searching for test files that might be affected..." rg -l "testsuperadmin" --type testLength of output: 1601
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test files with different extensions echo "Searching for test files containing 'testsuperadmin'..." fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.jsx -e spec.jsx -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx -x rg -l "testsuperadmin" {} echo "Searching for any hardcoded passwords in test files..." fd -e test.js -e spec.js -e test.ts -e spec.ts -e test.jsx -e spec.jsx -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx -x rg -l "Pass@123" {} echo "Checking for any other sample data files..." fd -g "*.json" -x rg -l "[email protected]" {}Length of output: 728
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the test file echo "Checking test file content..." cat tests/resolvers/Query/helperFunctions/getWhere.spec.ts echo "Checking for any environment files that might contain credentials..." fd -g "*.env*" -x rg -l "testsuperadmin" {} echo "Checking for any configuration files..." fd -g "*config*.{js,ts,json}" -x rg -l "testsuperadmin" {}Length of output: 10872
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2825 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.72% 97.72%
========================================
Files 364 364
Lines 18569 18569
Branches 2682 2682
========================================
Hits 18147 18147
Misses 417 417
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
gautam-divyanshu
requested review from
palisadoes,
Cioppolo14 and
gautam-divyanshu
gautam-divyanshu
merged commit 3600eaa
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #
#2824
Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit