Using nodemon to get rid of the experimental warning #2715
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
149-149: Verify nodemon version compatibility and security
The addition of nodemon looks good, but let's verify its compatibility and security.
✅ Verification successful
Nodemon dependency addition is safe and compatible
The verification shows:
- No security vulnerabilities found for nodemon
- Nodemon requires Node.js >= 10, which is a very permissive requirement
- No specific Node.js version constraint in package.json, so no compatibility conflicts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check nodemon version compatibility and security advisories
# Check for any security advisories for nodemon
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "nodemon") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
# Check package.json for Node.js version requirements
echo "Node.js version requirements:"
cat package.json | jq '.engines?.node'
# Check nodemon's Node.js version compatibility
echo "nodemon's Node.js compatibility:"
npm view nodemon engines
Length of output: 576
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
INSTALLATION.md (1)
1289-1289: Consider adding Devpod version compatibility information.The Devpod installation instructions are well-structured, but it would be helpful to specify:
- The minimum required version of Devpod
- Any known version compatibility issues
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
INSTALLATION.md(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
INSTALLATION.md (2)
102-104: LGTM: Table of contents updates are accurate.
The new TOC entries correctly reflect the added Devpod installation sections.
1289-1289: LGTM: MinIO data directory customization section is well-documented.
The section provides clear instructions for both automated and manual configuration of the MinIO data directory.
Suyash878
changed the title
|
|
nodemon does not rely on Node.js's watch experimental watch mode, it rather uses its own stable file watching implementation |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2715 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.74% 97.74%
========================================
Files 358 358
Lines 18114 18114
Branches 2599 2599
========================================
Hits 17706 17706
Misses 404 404
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
palisadoes
merged commit 832d310
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2227
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Adding a new dependency
nodemonwhich removes the experimental warning after starting the server, it uses its own file watching logic.Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
None
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
nodemonas a new dependency for improved script execution.