Bugfix: fixed duplication of chats #3360
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several documentation updates and code modifications related to the Chat feature, primarily focusing on preventing duplicate chat creation. The changes include updating documentation for various mock variables, introducing a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (1)
Missing test coverage for duplicate chat detection confirmed
The implementation includes proper duplicate chat detection and error handling, but there are no tests covering these scenarios. The original review comment is correct - test coverage is needed for:
- Attempting to create a duplicate chat
- Successfully creating a new chat
- Error handling when a duplicate is detected
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
79-100: Add test coverage for duplicate chat detection.Please add test cases to cover:
- Attempting to create a duplicate chat
- Successfully creating a new chat
- Error handling when a duplicate is detected
This will address the pipeline failure regarding code coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check current test coverage for CreateDirectChat rg -A 5 "test.*CreateDirectChat" "src/**/*test*"Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all test files echo "=== Test files ===" fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts # Find CreateDirectChat implementation echo -e "\n=== CreateDirectChat implementation ===" rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "CreateDirectChat" # Search for chat-related test files echo -e "\n=== Chat-related test files ===" fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts chatLength of output: 14147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check test content for duplicate chat scenarios echo "=== CreateDirectChat test content ===" cat src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx # Check implementation for error handling echo -e "\n=== CreateDirectChat implementation details ===" cat src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsxLength of output: 65857
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error handling in CreateDirectChat implementation echo "=== CreateDirectChat error handling ===" rg -A 5 -B 5 "catch|error|duplicate" "src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx" # Get the handleCreateDirectChat function implementation echo -e "\n=== handleCreateDirectChat implementation ===" ast-grep --pattern 'handleCreateDirectChat = async ($$$) => { $$$ }' "src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx"Length of output: 1204
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for duplicate chat test cases echo "=== Test cases for duplicate chat ===" rg -B 10 -A 10 "duplicate|already exists|chatExists" "src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx" # Search for error handler test cases echo -e "\n=== Error handler test cases ===" rg -B 5 -A 5 "error|expect.*fail|expect.*throw" "src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.spec.tsx"Length of output: 408
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (1)
80-84: Optimize the chat existence check using Array.some().The current implementation using forEach can be simplified for better readability and efficiency.
- let chatExists = false; - chats.forEach((chat) => { - if (chat.users[0]._id === id || chat.users[1]._id === id) - chatExists = true; - }); + const chatExists = chats.some( + (chat) => chat.users[0]._id === id || chat.users[1]._id === id + );🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/default.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_EMPTY.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_ERROR.md(2 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS.md(1 hunks)docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat/type-aliases/Chat.md(1 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- docs/docs/auto-docs/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat/functions/default.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat/type-aliases/Chat.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_EMPTY.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS.md
- docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_ERROR.md (2)
Learnt from: arpit-chakraborty
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3158
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts:384-524
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T05:39:30.480Z
Learning: In OrganizationTagsMocks.ts, MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR and MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES are designed to test UI handling of edge cases where pagination data is inconsistent (e.g., hasNextPage is true but endCursor is null, or next page returns undefined data).
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES.md (1)
Learnt from: arpit-chakraborty
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3158
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts:384-524
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T05:39:30.480Z
Learning: In OrganizationTagsMocks.ts, MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR and MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES are designed to test UI handling of edge cases where pagination data is inconsistent (e.g., hasNextPage is true but endCursor is null, or next page returns undefined data).
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx
[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES.md (1)
1-9: LGTM! Documentation is well-structured and comprehensive.The documentation for
MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGESis clear and follows the standard format. The type definitions accurately represent the complex structure needed for testing pagination edge cases.docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks/variables/MOCKS_ERROR.md (1)
9-9: LGTM! Documentation updates are accurate.The changes to the line number reference and the ID value from 'orgId' to 'orgIdError' are well documented. The distinction in ID values helps better identify error test cases.
Also applies to: 35-35
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (3)
21-22: LGTM! Necessary imports added.The new imports support the chat duplication check functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.
33-33: LGTM! Interface updated with chats property.The addition of
chats: Chat[]enables duplicate chat detection.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.
86-89: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling.The error handling:
- Uses the project's error handling utility
- Supports internationalization
- Provides clear user feedback
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.
src/screens/UserPortal/Chat/Chat.tsx (2)
Line range hint
87-101: LGTM! Chat type properly exported.The Chat type export enables proper type checking for duplicate chat detection.
335-335: LGTM! Chats prop correctly passed to CreateDirectChat.The implementation properly passes the current chats state for duplicate detection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (1)
Line range hint
137-207: Consider UX improvements for search and feedback.The component implementation is solid, but could benefit from these UX enhancements:
- Add debouncing to the search to prevent excessive API calls
- Show loading state during chat creation
- Use a toast notification for errors instead of the error handler
Would you like me to provide the implementation for these improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx(4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx (1)
21-22: LGTM! Well-structured type imports and interface updates.The new imports and interface changes are well-organized and properly typed, supporting the duplicate chat prevention feature.
Also applies to: 33-33
src/components/UserPortal/CreateDirectChat/CreateDirectChat.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3360 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 8.40% 89.78% +81.37%
=====================================================
Files 312 335 +23
Lines 8105 8621 +516
Branches 1801 1922 +121
=====================================================
+ Hits 681 7740 +7059
+ Misses 7347 624 -6723
- Partials 77 257 +180
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes CodeRabbit approved my changes but the check failed. I think the PR can be merged. |
palisadoes
merged commit 5434bfc
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
* fixed duplication of chats * removed istanbul ignore text * added error handling * added tests for createdirectchat.tsx
Fixes a Bug in the Chat section.
Issue Number:
Fixes #3301
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chattype alias.CreateDirectChatcomponent and related files.handleCreateDirectChatfunction.New Features
Refactor
Chattype to make it accessible across the application.CreateDirectChatcomponent to include chat list validation.