Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BugFix : Fixed failing ESLint and Prettier tests in scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js file #3186

Merged

Conversation

yugal07
Copy link

@yugal07 yugal07 commented Jan 6, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

BugFix

Issue Number:

Fixes #3184

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

Before
Screenshot from 2025-01-06 19-00-17

After
Screenshot from 2025-01-06 19-13-08

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not applicable

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Other information
Problem 1: ESLint was configured to check for type declarations in .js files, which caused a conflict since these files are not meant to have type declarations like TypeScript files.

Specifically, the rule @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type was being enforced on JavaScript files. This rule mandates that all functions must have an explicit return type, but this isn’t relevant for regular JavaScript files, leading to unnecessary linting warnings and errors.

To prevent ESLint from applying TypeScript-specific rules (like @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type) to JavaScript files, I added an override to the ESLint configuration file.

Problem 2: Prettier Test was failing since there were some missing commas in console.info
So i ran the prettier write command to fix that format to a better format.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated ESLint configuration to allow JavaScript files to bypass explicit function return type requirements.
    • Minor formatting updates to localStorage usage detection script output messages.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a minor modification to the ESLint configuration in .eslintrc.json by adding an overrides section that disables the @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type rule for JavaScript files. Additionally, the script check-localstorage-usage.js receives minor formatting updates with trailing commas in console.info statements. The changes appear to be focused on linting and code formatting improvements.

Changes

File Change Summary
.eslintrc.json Added overrides section to disable @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type for .js files
scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js Added trailing commas to two console.info statements

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Lint scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js [#3184]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • pranshugupta54
  • GlenDsza

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's lint-fix delight,
Commas dancing, configs just right,
ESLint rules now softly bend,
JavaScript files find their trend,
Code's harmony sings tonight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.eslintrc.json (1)

157-163: Consider disabling other TypeScript-specific rules for JS files.

While this fix addresses the immediate issue with function return types, there are other TypeScript-specific rules in the configuration that might cause similar issues with JavaScript files. Consider adding these rules to the override:

  • @typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types
  • @typescript-eslint/no-inferrable-types
  • @typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports
 "overrides": [
   {
     "files": ["*.js"],
     "rules": {
-      "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "off"
+      "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "off",
+      "@typescript-eslint/explicit-module-boundary-types": "off",
+      "@typescript-eslint/no-inferrable-types": "off",
+      "@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-imports": "off"
     }
   }
 ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8a1290 and 092a3a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
  • scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • scripts/githooks/check-localstorage-usage.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test Application
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.eslintrc.json (2)

157-163: LGTM! The override correctly addresses the TypeScript rule conflict.

The added override section properly disables the TypeScript return type requirement for JavaScript files, which aligns with the PR objective to fix ESLint failures.


157-163: Verify the fix resolves all ESLint errors in JavaScript files.

Let's ensure this change fixes all TypeScript-related ESLint errors in JavaScript files.

✅ Verification successful

ESLint override for JavaScript files is appropriate

The override to disable @typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type for JavaScript files is correct. Current JavaScript files in the codebase are simple configuration and utility files that don't contain complex function implementations, but this override ensures TypeScript-specific rules won't affect any JavaScript files added in the future.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining TypeScript-related ESLint errors in JavaScript files

# Find all JavaScript files
echo "JavaScript files that might be affected:"
fd -e js

# Run ESLint on JavaScript files and check for TypeScript-related errors
echo -e "\nChecking for remaining TypeScript-related ESLint errors:"
fd -e js -x eslint {} | grep -i typescript || echo "No TypeScript-related errors found"

Length of output: 774


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for function declarations and expressions in JavaScript files
echo "Checking function declarations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'function $NAME($_) { $$$ }' --lang js

echo -e "\nChecking function expressions and arrow functions:"
ast-grep --pattern '$_ = function($_) { $$$ }' --lang js
ast-grep --pattern '$_ = ($_) => $_' --lang js

Length of output: 357


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for various function patterns in JavaScript files
echo "Checking module.exports functions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'module.exports = $_' --lang js

echo -e "\nChecking object methods:"
ast-grep --pattern '{ $NAME($_) { $$$ } }' --lang js

echo -e "\nChecking exported arrow functions:"
ast-grep --pattern 'exports.$_ = $_' --lang js
ast-grep --pattern 'module.exports.$_ = $_' --lang js

echo -e "\nChecking direct function declarations:"
rg "function" -A 2 --type js

Length of output: 1550

@yugal07
Copy link
Author

yugal07 commented Jan 6, 2025

Hello @palisadoes,

I hope you're doing well. Could you please review the PR whenever you get a chance? Let me know if there are any changes or adjustments I need to make.

Thank you!

.eslintrc.json Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 68d6193 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 8, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
rishav-jha-mech pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
* prevented unnecessary page reload with complementary test

* Update jest.config.js

* Fixes #2986 - Multiple UI Updates (#3165)

* UI fixes on organisation pages

* Added TSDoc for Truncated Text

* Added Debouncer

* Update src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.tsx

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Added code rabbit suggestions

* Fixed test error

---------

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactore src/screens/OrgList from jest to vitest (#3200)

* Improved Code Coverage in src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx (#3203)

* Improved Code Coverage in src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx

* removed the ignore statements from VenueModal.tsx

* Removed istanbul ignore lines. Code coverage remians 100% (#3207)

* refactored src/screens/FundCampaignPledge from jest to vitest (#3208)

* prettier formatting and disabled ts-specific rules for js in eslint (#3186)

* Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/UserPortal/Settings/Settings.tsx (#3189)

* Preventing Overflow of images in Advertisement and Venue Post modals (#3204)

* improve code coverage of src/screens/EventManagement (#3149)

* code coverage

* jest global coverage decreased

* global jest coverage

* rename file problem solved

* changes requested resolved

* fix: update Chat section title to 'Chats' (#3216)

* removed stale comment line

* Revert "removed stale comment line"

This reverts commit e0fa894.

* removed stale comment line

---------

Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mehul Aggarwal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Syed Ali Ul Hasan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: harshk-89 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Amaan ali <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yugal Sadhwani <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pranav Nathe <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: prathmesh703 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nivedita <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants