Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved code coverage of src/screens/OrganizationVenues/Organization… #3121

Conversation

Dhiren-Mhatre
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhiren-Mhatre Dhiren-Mhatre commented Jan 2, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improved Code Coverage in src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx

Issue Number:

Fixes #3032

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. Added comprehensive test coverage for src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx

Snapshots/Videos:

Screencast.from.2025-01-02.16-16-35.mp4

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

N/A

Summary

This PR improves code coverage for the OrganizationVenues component by:

  • Adding test cases for previously uncovered code paths
  • Removing unnecessary istanbul ignore statements
  • Ensuring 100% test coverage of the component

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Code coverage increased from previous coverage to 100% for the specified component.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests

    • Enhanced test coverage for the Organization Venues component.
    • Added tests for error handling scenarios during venue query and deletion.
    • Verified venue list rendering after loading state.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling mechanisms for venue-related operations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing error handling and test coverage for the OrganizationVenues component. Changes include the addition of error handling tests in the OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx file and the removal of /* istanbul ignore */ comments in the OrganizationVenues.tsx file. These modifications ensure that error scenarios are properly tested and that code coverage is improved by addressing previously ignored sections.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx Added error handling tests for venue query and deletion, including mocking error scenarios and verifying errorHandler calls.
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx Removed /* istanbul ignore next */ comments from error handling sections in handleDelete function and venue error handling block.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3032]
Remove Istanbul Ignore Comments [#3032]
Create Test Cases for 100% Coverage [#3032]

Possibly related issues

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • rishav-jha-mech

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, where errors hide,
Our tests now dance with rabbit pride!
No more ignored lines shall we see,
Coverage complete, our logic free!
Hop, hop, hooray for clean design! 🧪


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2)

510-512: Remove extraneous blank lines.
Prettier flags these lines for removal to maintain code cleanliness and consistent formatting.

511- 
512-
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 511-512: Delete

(prettier/prettier)


514-611: Thorough error handling test suite; address formatting issues.
The new test suite comprehensively covers error scenarios for venue queries and deletions. This significantly improves resilience by verifying that errors are captured and reported properly. However, static analysis tools have flagged multiple indentation and spacing issues in this block.

Below is a single diff snippet to resolve the most critical Prettier complaints (removing extra blank lines, aligning indentation, and breaking up long lines). If you already have a Prettier configuration, simply running your formatter should handle these fixes automatically:

@@ -541,5 +541,7 @@ describe('Organisation Venues Error Handling', () => {
  await waitFor(() => {
-    expect(errorHandler).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(Function), mockError);
+    expect(errorHandler).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.any(Function),
+      mockError,
+    );
  });
});

@@ -511,2 +511,0 @@
- 
-
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 541-541: Replace expect.any(Function),·mockError with ⏎········expect.any(Function),⏎········mockError,⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 547-547: Insert ⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 548-548: Replace ······ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 549-549: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 550-550: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 551-551: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 552-552: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 553-553: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 554-554: Replace ············ with ··············

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 555-555: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 556-556: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 557-557: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 558-558: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 559-559: Replace ········ with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 560-560: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 561-561: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 562-562: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 563-563: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 564-564: Replace ················ with ··················

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 565-565: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 566-566: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 567-567: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 568-568: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 569-569: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 570-570: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 571-571: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 572-572: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 573-573: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 574-574: Replace ······ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 575-575: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 576-576: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 577-577: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 578-578: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 579-579: Replace ········ with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 580-580: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 581-581: Replace ····],·true with ······],⏎······true,⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 584-584: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 588-588: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 592-592: Replace expect.any(Function),·mockError with ⏎········expect.any(Function),⏎········mockError,⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 598-598: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 601-601: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 606-606: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 611-611: Insert

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78be925 and 708e1ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx

[error] 511-512: Delete

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 541-541: Replace expect.any(Function),·mockError with ⏎········expect.any(Function),⏎········mockError,⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 547-547: Insert ⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 548-548: Replace ······ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 549-549: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 550-550: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 551-551: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 552-552: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 553-553: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 554-554: Replace ············ with ··············

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 555-555: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 556-556: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 557-557: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 558-558: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 559-559: Replace ········ with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 560-560: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 561-561: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 562-562: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 563-563: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 564-564: Replace ················ with ··················

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 565-565: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 566-566: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 567-567: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 568-568: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 569-569: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 570-570: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 571-571: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 572-572: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 573-573: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 574-574: Replace ······ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 575-575: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 576-576: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 577-577: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 578-578: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 579-579: Replace ········ with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 580-580: Insert ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 581-581: Replace ····],·true with ······],⏎······true,⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 584-584: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 588-588: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 592-592: Replace expect.any(Function),·mockError with ⏎········expect.any(Function),⏎········mockError,⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 598-598: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 601-601: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 606-606: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 611-611: Insert

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2)

34-35: Good addition of the error handler import.
Using a centralized error handling utility ensures consistency and standard behavior for error conditions across the codebase.


513-513: Mocking the error handler is a good practice for error-related tests.
This enables verification that the error handler is invoked with the correct parameters without triggering its real side effects.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (1)

517-544: Check for additional user-facing feedback
The test verifies errorHandler is called, which is great. However, consider also verifying any expected user-facing alerts or toasts triggered by errorHandler, to ensure the user is informed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 708e1ad and 8f91e63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.spec.tsx (5)

34-35: Great use of errorHandler import
It's good to see the explicit import of errorHandler here, which sets up the new test coverage for error scenarios.


511-511: Mocking errorHandler is consistent with test best practices
Mocking the error handler ensures we can verify that it is called with the correct arguments in error scenarios.


512-516: Thorough error handling test suite
The new “Organisation Venues Error Handling” describe block is a welcome addition. It isolates error scenarios, improving clarity and directing focus on coverage for previously uncovered conditions.


546-602: Comprehensive coverage for deletion errors
Testing error scenarios for the venue deletion flow substantially reduces the risk of unhandled errors in production.


603-617: Good coverage for loading and normal states
This test confirms that the loading spinner disappears and that the venue list renders correctly. That fully covers the success scenario after an error test, ensuring robust coverage.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.51%. Comparing base (78be925) to head (8f91e63).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3121       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             23.64%   89.51%   +65.87%     
=====================================================
  Files                   301      322       +21     
  Lines                  7677     8452      +775     
  Branches               1677     1902      +225     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   1815     7566     +5751     
+ Misses                 5738      655     -5083     
- Partials                124      231      +107     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@GlenDsza GlenDsza self-requested a review January 2, 2025 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants