Improve Code Coverage in src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx #3112
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the test coverage for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.spec.tsx (4)
14-20: Consider verifying all toast calls for different edge cases.
These mocks forreact-toastifylook good. However, you might consider adding additional tests for distinct toast messages (success/error) to confirm correct usage in all edge cases (e.g., multiple remove attempts, repeated errors, etc.).
39-42: Expand test coverage with varied parameters.
Although these variables are correct for a single user removal scenario, consider adding tests for different user/org IDs to ensure coverage across multiple inputs.
Line range hint
86-136: Use waitFor or direct asynchronous checks instead of setTimeout.
Currently you’re relying onawait new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0))to wait for asynchronous operations. Usingawait waitFor(() => …)can be more robust, ensuring the promise resolves when the DOM and mocks stabilize, rather than a fixed timer.
165-186: Consider adding an accessible label to the close button.
The close button is identified by an empty name. For better accessibility, add an aria-label or descriptive text for the close icon.-const closeButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: '' }); +const closeButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /close/i });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.spec.tsx (4)
23-33: Ensure consistent path handling and route testing.
Mocking react-router-dom is appropriate here. If you add any new routes or route checks, be sure to reflect them in this mock and in the associated tests for consistent coverage.
70-70: Validate props structure.
It's a good practice to typecheck or strongly type props in TypeScript test files as well to catch potential type mismatches at compile time.
74-84: Ensure no residual side effects after tests.
The beforeEach hook sets up window.location. Verify no test modifies this global state in ways that persist across tests. If needed, reset window.location in an afterEach hook.
187-200: Great test coverage for undefined IDs.
Verifying the redirect path with undefined IDs is a key edge case; good job ensuring coverage here.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3112 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 24.64% 89.35% +64.71%
=====================================================
Files 301 322 +21
Lines 7628 8421 +793
Branches 1668 1897 +229
=====================================================
+ Hits 1880 7525 +5645
+ Misses 5621 661 -4960
- Partials 127 235 +108 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit 96509f4
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improve Code Coverage in src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx
Issue Number:
Fixes #3054
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores