Improved Code Coverage in CreateGroupChat.tsx #3068 #3088
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the test coverage for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.spec.tsx (2)
5598-5642: Comprehensive image upload test
The test accurately simulates user interaction with the file input. Consider adding assetion steps to verify the UI's response or error handling (e.g., ensuring a preview displays, or an error is thrown for invalid extension).
6161-6185: Invalid file upload
Good coverage for ensuring the component gracefully handles unsupported file types. If not already covered, consider asserting that the UI displays an appropriate error or warning message.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.spec.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.spec.tsx (14)
21-21: Import statement for the CreateGroupChat component
The addition of this import statement is clear and logically placed.
5581-5596: Centralized environment setup with beforeEach
Using window.HTMLElement.prototype.scrollIntoView and window.matchMedia mocks in the beforeEach block is a good approach to ensure the test environment is consistently set for each test.
5643-5689: Testing group description input
The test thoroughly checks the state change of the description input. This is a clean and maintainable approach.
5690-5744: Validating user search & form submission
This test comprehensively verifies the transition from the title/description step to the user search step, input changes, and form submission.
5745-5780: Blank title & description scenario
This test covers a crucial negative scenario. If the form or UI is meant to display an error message, consider adding an explicit assertion for that message to confirm correct handling of blank inputs.
5781-5820: Managing the create-user modal toggle
The test properly simulates opening and closing the user modal. This ensures users can dismiss the modal without side effects.
5821-5857: Handling null/undefined file uploads
Testing edge cases like null/empty FileList is excellent. This ensures the code gracefully handles unexpected or invalid user actions.
5859-5900: Empty user search submission
The test effectively covers an empty search scenario, confirming the system neither crashes nor fails to render essential UI elements.
5901-5944: User selection and deselection workflow
Verifying both adding and removing a user provides confidence in the user-assignment logic. This test ensures the correct toggling of add/remove buttons.
6153-6153: Additional suite organization
Separating these additional tests into their own describe block makes the suite more readable and maintainable.
6187-6229: Loading state validations
By purposely delaying or mocking the USERS_CONNECTION_LIST query, this test confirms the UI provides a meaningful loading indication. It might be helpful to assert for a specific loading spinner or text to further confirm user experience.
6231-6275: Empty user search result
Ensuring the table is empty when no users are returned is a key negative test scenario. This is well-implemented.
6277-6301: Form validation flow
This test checks that the user can proceed even with no inputs, indicating non-blocking validation. Confirm that this behavior aligns with functional requirements.
6303-6326: Clicking the image edit button
The test properly simulates an edit interaction and verifies that the file input remains accessible. This is good coverage for UI triggers.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3088 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.46% 89.07% +62.60%
=====================================================
Files 300 321 +21
Lines 7568 8410 +842
Branches 1652 1895 +243
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7491 +5488
+ Misses 5434 678 -4756
- Partials 131 241 +110 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit 6ff0594
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improved Code Coverage in CreateGroupChat.tsx
Issue Number:
Fixes #3068
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes. Added comprehensive test coverage for
src/components/UserPortal/CreateGroupChat/CreateGroupChat.tsxSnapshots/Videos:
Screencast.from.2024-12-30.23-21-01.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
This PR improves code coverage for the CreateGroupChat component by:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Code coverage increased from previous coverage to 100% for the specified component.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Bug Fixes
data-testidattribute for group description input