Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add functionalities for bulk tag operations (GSoC) #2362

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

meetulr
Copy link
Contributor

@meetulr meetulr commented Oct 27, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

It implements tag actions: assign/remove multiple people to tags, edit/remove tag.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2357

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Demo

tagActions.mp4

Additional Context

talawa-api issue: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2614

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced tag management with new translation keys across multiple languages, improving user interactions.
    • Introduced new GraphQL mutations for assigning and removing tags, streamlining tag management processes.
    • Added a TagActions component for managing user tags with modal support, enhancing user experience.
    • Implemented a TagNode component for displaying tags in a collapsible format, improving UI organization.
    • Updated the ManageTag component with new modals for assigning, editing, and removing tags, enhancing functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error messages for tag loading and user actions, providing clearer feedback to users.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive tests for the TagActions component and ManageTag functionalities, ensuring reliable performance.
  • Documentation

    • Updated mock data and interfaces to reflect new functionalities, enhancing clarity and usability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@meetulr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 052aead and d8d657a.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant enhancements to the tag management functionality in the application. It includes the addition of new translation keys across multiple language files, facilitating better user interaction and error handling. Furthermore, new GraphQL mutations for assigning and removing tags are implemented, along with a new TagActions component that manages these operations. The changes also encompass updates to existing components and tests, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the new functionalities.

Changes

File Change Summary
public/locales/en/translation.json Added new translation keys in manageTag section for tag management and updated error messages.
public/locales/fr/translation.json Added new keys in manageTag for tag management and updated existing keys for consistency.
public/locales/hi/translation.json Introduced new keys in multiple sections, enhancing tag management and user administration.
public/locales/sp/translation.json Added new keys for tag management and refined existing translations for clarity.
public/locales/zh/translation.json Added new keys for tag management and updated existing error messages for clarity.
src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts Added ASSIGN_TO_TAGS and REMOVE_FROM_TAGS mutations for managing tag assignments.
src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx Updated button label in modal from assignPeople to assign.
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.module.css Introduced new CSS styles for buttons, error messages, and responsive layouts.
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx Added tests for TagActions component covering various scenarios and interactions.
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Created a new component for managing tag assignments and removals with modal functionality.
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts Introduced mock data for testing GraphQL interactions related to user tags.
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Added a new component for displaying tags in a collapsible format with child tags.
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx Enhanced test coverage for ManageTag component with new modal tests.
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Added new modal states and handlers for managing tags, including assignment and removal.
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts Updated mock data for GraphQL queries related to user tags.
src/utils/interfaces.ts Modified interfaces to reflect new data structures for tags and their properties.
src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts Added constant TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT and type TagActionType for tag management functionalities.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement UI and functionalities to assign/remove tags (#2357)
Add a modal on the manage tag screen for tag operations (#2357)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • aashimawadhwa

Poem

🐰 In the garden where tags grow,
New translations help us know,
Assign and remove with ease,
User actions sure to please!
With modals bright and clear,
Managing tags brings us cheer! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 29

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (25)
src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (2)

26-26: Consider documenting the rationale for query limits and ensuring consistency.

There are now two different query limits in this file: ADD_PEOPLE_TO_TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT = 7 and TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT = 10. Consider:

  1. Adding documentation to explain why these limits differ
  2. Making the limits consistent if there's no specific reason for the difference
  3. Making the constant name more specific (e.g., TAGS_LIST_QUERY_LIMIT) to better indicate its usage

28-28: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc documentation.

The TagActionType type is well-designed and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives for bulk tag operations. Consider adding JSDoc documentation for better IDE support:

+/** Type representing the available bulk actions for tag operations */
 export type TagActionType = 'assignToTags' | 'removeFromTags';
src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (1)

91-96: Fix typo in documentation

There's a typo in the @param description: "assined" should be "assigned".

- * @param selectedTagIds - Ids of the selected tags to be assined.
+ * @param selectedTagIds - Ids of the selected tags to be assigned.
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.module.css (1)

25-27: Consider using border property instead of outline for better cross-browser support.

.btnsContainer input {
-  outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
+  border: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
}
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (1)

43-49: Consider using type-safe translation key access.

The current translation setup using JSON.parse could be made more type-safe to catch missing translations at compile time.

-const translations = {
-  ...JSON.parse(
-    JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.manageTag ?? {}),
-  ),
-  ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common ?? {})),
-  ...JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors ?? {})),
-};
+type TranslationKeys = keyof typeof i18n.getDataByLanguage('en').translation.manageTag &
+  keyof typeof i18n.getDataByLanguage('en').common &
+  keyof typeof i18n.getDataByLanguage('en').errors;
+
+const translations = {
+  ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.translation.manageTag,
+  ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.common,
+  ...i18n.getDataByLanguage('en')?.errors,
+} as Record<TranslationKeys, string>;
src/utils/interfaces.ts (2)

Line range hint 223-256: Consider extracting common pagination interface.

The pagination structure (edges, pageInfo, totalCount) is repeated across interfaces. Consider extracting this into a reusable generic interface.

interface PaginatedResponse<T> {
  edges: {
    node: T;
    cursor: string;
  }[];
  pageInfo: {
    startCursor: string;
    endCursor: string;
    hasNextPage: boolean;
    hasPreviousPage: boolean;
  };
  totalCount: number;
}

interface InterfaceTagNodeData extends PaginatedResponse<InterfaceTagData> {}
interface InterfaceTagMembersData extends PaginatedResponse<{
  _id: string;
  firstName: string;
  lastName: string;
}> {}

Line range hint 268-276: Remove duplicate interface declaration.

The InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo interface is declared twice. Remove the duplicate declaration.

-export interface InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo {
-  name: string;
-  usersToAssignTo: InterfaceTagMembersData;
-}
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (1)

387-409: Consider enhancing the edit tag test coverage

While the test verifies the success notification, consider adding an assertion to verify that the tag name is actually updated in the UI after the edit operation completes.

 userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('editTagSubmitBtn'));

 await waitFor(() => {
   expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
     translations.tagUpdationSuccess,
   );
 });
+
+// Add verification for UI update
+await waitFor(() => {
+  expect(screen.getByText('tag 1 edited')).toBeInTheDocument();
+});
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (2)

310-467: Consider enhancing test coverage with diverse test cases

While the mock data is well-structured, consider adding edge cases to improve test coverage:

  • Tags with special characters or very long names
  • Non-sequential IDs to avoid assumptions about ID patterns
  • Tags with empty names or whitespace-only names

484-498: Add error cases for REMOVE_USER_TAG

Consider adding test cases for:

  • Attempting to remove a tag with assigned users
  • Attempting to remove a tag with child tags
  • Attempting to remove a non-existent tag

Example:

{
  request: {
    query: REMOVE_USER_TAG,
    variables: {
      id: 'tag-with-users',
    },
  },
  result: {
    errors: [{
      message: 'Cannot remove tag with assigned users',
      extensions: { code: 'TAG_HAS_USERS' }
    }]
  },
},
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)

421-453: Add error scenarios for mutations.

While the success scenarios are covered, the mutations lack error scenario mocks. Consider adding error cases for:

  • Invalid tag IDs
  • Permission denied
  • Concurrent modification conflicts

This would improve test coverage for error handling in the UI.

public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)

351-355: Consider improving the tag validation message.

The translation for noTagSelected ("未选择标签") could be more descriptive to better guide users.

Consider this alternative translation:

-    "noTagSelected": "未选择标签"
+    "noTagSelected": "请选择至少一个标签"
public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)

341-355: LGTM! The translations for bulk tag operations are well-written.

The new translations are comprehensive and align well with the PR objectives for implementing bulk tag operations. The messages are clear, user-friendly, and maintain consistent Hindi terminology.

Consider adding a period at the end of the error message on line 348 for consistency with other error messages in the file:

-    "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags": "संगठन टैग्स को लोड करते समय त्रुटि हुई",
+    "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags": "संगठन टैग्स को लोड करते समय त्रुटि हुई।",
public/locales/fr/translation.json (2)

341-355: Maintain consistent terminology for "tag".

The translations inconsistently use both "tag" and "étiquette". For consistency with the rest of the file (e.g., organizationTags section), consider using "étiquette" throughout:

-    "assignToTags": "Attribuer aux tags",
-    "removeFromTags": "Retirer des tags",
-    "successfullyAssignedToTags": "Attribué aux tags avec succès",
-    "successfullyRemovedFromTags": "Retiré des tags avec succès",
-    "removeUserTag": "Supprimer le tag",
-    "removeUserTagMessage": "Voulez-vous supprimer ce tag ? Cela supprimera tous les sous-tags et toutes les associations.",
+    "assignToTags": "Attribuer aux étiquettes",
+    "removeFromTags": "Retirer des étiquettes",
+    "successfullyAssignedToTags": "Attribué aux étiquettes avec succès",
+    "successfullyRemovedFromTags": "Retiré des étiquettes avec succès",
+    "removeUserTag": "Supprimer l'étiquette",
+    "removeUserTagMessage": "Voulez-vous supprimer cette étiquette ? Cela supprimera toutes les sous-étiquettes et toutes les associations.",

350-350: Enhance the warning message for tag deletion.

The current warning message could be more explicit about the permanent nature of the deletion.

-    "removeUserTagMessage": "Voulez-vous supprimer ce tag ? Cela supprimera tous les sous-tags et toutes les associations.",
+    "removeUserTagMessage": "Voulez-vous vraiment supprimer cette étiquette ? Cette action est irréversible et supprimera définitivement toutes les sous-étiquettes et associations.",
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (4)

110-148: Improve accessibility with ARIA attributes and semantic elements

Interactive elements like the expand/collapse toggles and checkboxes should include ARIA attributes to enhance accessibility.

Add ARIA labels or roles to elements to ensure they are accessible to all users.

<span
  onClick={handleTagClick}
+ aria-label={expanded ? 'Collapse' : 'Expand'}
+ role="button"
  className="me-3"
  style={{ cursor: 'pointer' }}
  data-testid={`expandSubTags${tag._id}`}
>
  {expanded ? '▼' : '▶'}
</span>

159-165: Avoid inline styles to improve maintainability

Inline styles can make the code harder to maintain and override. It's better to define styles in the CSS module.

Move the inline styles to the TagActions.module.css file.

- style={{
-   height: 300,
-   overflow: 'auto',
- }}
+ className={styles.subTagsContainer}

And in TagActions.module.css:

.subTagsContainer {
  height: 300px;
  overflow: auto;
}

71-75: Type event parameter explicitly in handleCheckboxChange

Explicitly typing the event parameter enhances readability and reduces potential TypeScript errors.

Specify the type of the event parameter:

const handleCheckboxChange = (
-  e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>,
+  e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>
): void => {

63-69: Simplify handleTagClick logic

The current logic toggles the expanded state based on its current value, which can be simplified.

Simplify the toggle logic:

const handleTagClick = (): void => {
-  if (!expanded) {
-    setExpanded(true);
-  } else {
-    setExpanded(false);
-  }
+  setExpanded(!expanded);
};
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (3)

270-271: Handle all error cases in catch blocks

In your error handling within the catch blocks, only errors that are instances of Error are being handled. If an error occurs that doesn't inherit from Error, it will not be caught. To ensure all errors are handled gracefully, consider adding an else clause to handle unexpected error types.

Apply this diff to handle all error scenarios:

         if (error instanceof Error) {
           toast.error(error.message);
+        } else {
+          toast.error('An unexpected error occurred.');
         }

Also applies to: 296-297


160-184: Use functional updates when state depends on previous state

In selectTag and deSelectTag, when updating selectedTags, it's good practice to use the functional form of setState when the new state depends on the previous state. Although you're already using it in selectTag, ensure consistency by applying the same in deSelectTag.

Apply this diff for consistency:

        setSelectedTags(
-          selectedTags.filter((selectedTag) => selectedTag._id !== tag._id),
+          (prevSelectedTags) =>
+            prevSelectedTags.filter((selectedTag) => selectedTag._id !== tag._id),
        );

85-87: Handle the case when userTagsList is undefined

When orgUserTagsData is undefined, userTagsList will also be undefined, which could cause issues in components relying on it. Consider providing a default empty array to userTagsList to ensure it is always iterable.

Apply this diff to provide a default value:

-const userTagsList = orgUserTagsData?.organizations[0]?.userTags.edges.map(
+const userTagsList = orgUserTagsData?.organizations[0]?.userTags.edges.map(
     (edge) => edge.node,
+) ?? [];
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (3)

673-673: Remove Unnecessary data-dismiss Attributes

The data-dismiss attribute is not necessary in React components since modal visibility is controlled via state. Consider removing data-dismiss="modal" to clean up the code.

Suggested changes:

In line 673:

   <Button
     type="button"
     className="btn btn-danger"
-    data-dismiss="modal"
     onClick={toggleRemoveTagModal}
     data-testid="removeUserTagModalCloseBtn"
   >

Similarly, in line 675:

   <Button
     type="button"
     className="btn btn-success"
-    data-dismiss="modal"
     onClick={handleRemoveUserTag}
     data-testid="removeUserTagSubmitBtn"
   >

Also applies to: 675-675


620-620: Use onSubmit Instead of onSubmitCapture in Form

Unless there's a specific need to capture the submit event before it bubbles, consider using onSubmit instead of onSubmitCapture for better code clarity.

Suggested change:

-          <Form onSubmitCapture={editTag}>
+          <Form onSubmit={editTag}>

Line range hint 154-156: Standardize Naming for Unassign Modal Functions

The function toggleUnassignTagModal controls unassignTagModalIsOpen, but the naming could be clearer. Consider renaming toggleUnassignTagModal to toggleUnassignUserTagModal for clarity and consistency.

Suggested change:

-  const toggleUnassignTagModal = (): void => {
+  const toggleUnassignUserTagModal = (): void => {
     if (unassignTagModalIsOpen) {
       setUnassignUserId(null);
     }
     setUnassignTagModalIsOpen(!unassignTagModalIsOpen);
   };

Update all references to this function in the component.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9d7269 and 1b4b913.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.module.css (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (10 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/utils/interfaces.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:31:37.405Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:31:37.405Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
🔇 Additional comments (30)
src/utils/organizationTagsUtils.ts (1)

26-28: Verify the integration with other components.

Let's verify how these new additions are being used across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Integration verified - constant and type are properly utilized

The verification shows proper integration:

  • TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT is consistently used for pagination in GraphQL queries across multiple components:

    • ManageTag screen
    • TagNode and TagActions components
    • Test mocks in ManageTagMocks and TagActionsMocks
  • TagActionType is correctly imported and used in:

    • TagActions component for action type prop
    • ManageTag screen for managing tag assignment states
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new constant and type

echo "Checking TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT usage:"
rg "TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT" -A 2

echo -e "\nChecking TagActionType usage:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = TagActionType'
rg "TagActionType" -A 2

Length of output: 5821

src/GraphQl/Mutations/TagMutations.ts (3)

98-106: LGTM! Implementation follows established patterns

The mutation is well-structured with:

  • Proper non-null type constraints
  • Consistent return type (_id)
  • Clear input parameter structure

108-123: LGTM! Well-implemented complementary operation

The REMOVE_FROM_TAGS mutation is properly implemented as a mirror operation to ASSIGN_TO_TAGS, maintaining consistency in:

  • Parameter structure
  • Documentation style
  • Return type
  • Type safety with non-null constraints

98-123: Verify mutation usage in TagActions component

Let's verify that these mutations are properly integrated with error handling in the TagActions component.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the implementation details in these files.


Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the implementation.

Mutations are properly integrated with error handling

The mutations are correctly implemented in TagActions.tsx with:

  • Proper initialization using useMutation hooks for both mutations
  • Try-catch blocks in the handler functions
  • Error handling through form event prevention
  • Async/await pattern for mutation execution
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for mutation usage and error handling
echo "Checking mutation imports and usage..."
rg -l "ASSIGN_TO_TAGS|REMOVE_FROM_TAGS" src/components/TagActions/

echo "Checking error handling implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
  ASSIGN_TO_TAGS
  $$$
} catch' src/components/TagActions/

Length of output: 427


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation in TagActions.tsx
echo "Checking TagActions.tsx implementation..."
rg -A 10 "ASSIGN_TO_TAGS|REMOVE_FROM_TAGS" src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx

# Check error handling patterns
echo -e "\nChecking error handling patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'useMutation<$_>($_, {
  $$$
  onError: $_
  $$$
})'

# Check if there are any try-catch blocks
echo -e "\nChecking try-catch blocks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} catch (error) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 27987

src/components/TagActions/TagActions.module.css (1)

33-79: LGTM! Well-structured responsive design implementation.

The media queries effectively handle different screen sizes with appropriate layout adjustments.

src/utils/interfaces.ts (3)

212-221: Well-structured interface for tag data!

The InterfaceTagData interface is well-designed with clear property names and appropriate nesting. The inclusion of totalCount in both usersAssignedTo and childTags properly supports pagination requirements.


258-270: Good interface rename for clarity!

The rename from InterfaceQueryUserTagChildTags to InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo better reflects its purpose in the bulk tag operations feature.


Line range hint 212-276: Verify interface usage across the codebase.

Let's ensure all components are properly updated to use these modified interfaces.

✅ Verification successful

Interface changes are properly implemented across the codebase

The verification shows that all components using these interfaces (InterfaceTagData, InterfaceQueryUserTagChildTags, and InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo) have consistent usage with the interface definitions:

  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx
  • src/components/AddPeopleToTag/AddPeopleToTag.tsx
  • src/screens/SubTags/SubTags.tsx

All imports and type annotations are correctly aligned with the interface definitions in src/utils/interfaces.ts. The duplicate interface declaration of InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo in the original file should be removed, but this doesn't affect the current usage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using these interfaces
echo "Searching for components using tag interfaces..."
rg "InterfaceTagData|InterfaceQueryUserTagChildTags|InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo" --type ts --type tsx

# Search for GraphQL operations using these types
echo "Searching for GraphQL operations..."
rg "type TagData|type UserTagChildTags|type UserTagsMembersToAssignTo" --type graphql

Length of output: 451


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for components using tag interfaces with correct ripgrep syntax
echo "Searching for components using tag interfaces..."
rg "InterfaceTagData|InterfaceQueryUserTagChildTags|InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo"

# Let's also search for any files that might be importing from interfaces.ts
echo "Searching for imports from interfaces.ts..."
rg "from ['\"].*interfaces['\"]"

# Search for potential usage of these interfaces in type annotations
echo "Searching for type annotations..."
rg ": (InterfaceTagData|InterfaceQueryUserTagChildTags|InterfaceQueryUserTagsMembersToAssignTo)"

# Let's also check if there are any GraphQL files
echo "Listing GraphQL files..."
fd -e graphql

Length of output: 12558

src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (6)

Line range hint 62-67: LGTM: Cache configuration for getUserTag field

The merge strategy to replace existing data with incoming data is appropriate for this use case.


190-210: LGTM: Comprehensive test for assignToTags modal

The test properly verifies the modal's open/close functionality with appropriate assertions and waiting patterns.


212-232: LGTM: Well-structured test for removeFromTags modal

The test effectively verifies the modal's functionality with proper assertions and waiting patterns.


234-254: LGTM: Consistent test implementation for edit tag modal

The test maintains consistency with other modal tests while properly verifying the edit tag modal functionality.


256-276: LGTM: Well-implemented test for remove tag modal

The test properly verifies the remove tag modal functionality while maintaining consistency with other modal tests.


411-432: LGTM: Comprehensive test for tag removal flow

The test effectively verifies both the success notification and the subsequent navigation to the organization tags page.

src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts (1)

1-12: LGTM! Well-organized imports

The new imports are properly organized and align with the PR objectives for implementing bulk tag operations.

src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.

The imports are properly structured and follow best practices for organizing GraphQL operations and utilities.


168-222: LGTM! Well-implemented pagination mock.

The pagination mock correctly implements cursor-based pagination with appropriate pageInfo fields and maintains consistency in totalCount across pages.

public/locales/zh/translation.json (3)

341-347: LGTM: Translations for bulk tag operations are well-structured.

The translations for bulk tag operations are clear and consistent with the feature requirements. They cover:

  • Tag selection validation (noOneSelected)
  • Bulk assignment/removal actions (assignToTags, removeFromTags)
  • Action buttons (assign, remove)
  • Success messages (successfullyAssignedToTags, successfullyRemovedFromTags)

348-350: LGTM: Error handling and tag removal translations are appropriate.

The translations properly handle:

  • Error messages for loading organization tags
  • Tag removal confirmation dialog

341-355: Verify translation key consistency across language files.

Let's ensure these new translation keys are present in all language files.

✅ Verification successful

Since the script executed without printing any "Missing key" messages for any of the languages, this indicates that all the translation keys are present across all language files (en, fr, hi, and sp). Let me generate the final response:

Translation keys are consistent across all language files

All the new translation keys in the Chinese (zh) locale file are properly synchronized with English (en), French (fr), Hindi (hi), and Spanish (sp) translation files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all new translation keys exist in other language files
# Expected: All keys should be present in en, fr, hi, and sp translation files

KEYS=(
  "noOneSelected"
  "assignToTags"
  "removeFromTags"
  "assign"
  "remove"
  "successfullyAssignedToTags"
  "successfullyRemovedFromTags"
  "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags"
  "removeUserTag"
  "removeUserTagMessage"
  "tagDetails"
  "tagName"
  "tagUpdationSuccess"
  "tagRemovalSuccess"
  "noTagSelected"
)

# Check each translation file
for lang in en fr hi sp; do
  echo "Checking $lang translations..."
  for key in "${KEYS[@]}"; do
    rg -q "\"$key\":" "public/locales/$lang/translation.json" || echo "Missing key '$key' in $lang translations"
  done
done

Length of output: 6152

public/locales/en/translation.json (4)

341-348: LGTM! Comprehensive translations for bulk tag operations.

The new translation keys properly support the bulk tag operations functionality, including:

  • User selection feedback
  • Action labels for assigning/removing tags
  • Success messages for both operations

349-350: Improved clarity in tag removal message.

The updated message now clearly communicates that deleting a tag will also remove its sub-tags and associations, helping users make informed decisions.


351-355: LGTM! Additional tag management translations.

The new keys properly support:

  • Tag details view
  • Tag name field
  • Success messages for updates/deletions
  • Empty state handling

341-355: Verify translations in other locale files.

The changes look good in the English translations. Let's verify that corresponding translations have been added to other language files.

✅ Verification successful

The previous script failed because the glob pattern wasn't expanded correctly. Let's verify what translation files actually exist first, and then check their content.


Let's verify the presence and translations of all the other keys across locale files.


All translations are present and properly localized

The verification shows that all new translation keys are present in all locale files (en, fr, hi, sp, zh) with appropriate translations in their respective languages. Some keys appear multiple times in certain files, but this is likely due to similar translations being used in different contexts, which is acceptable.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new translation keys exist in other locale files
# Test: Search for new keys in other locale files. Expect: Keys should exist in all locale files.

echo "Checking translations in other locale files..."

# List of new keys to check
keys=(
  "noOneSelected"
  "assignToTags"
  "removeFromTags"
  "assign"
  "remove"
  "successfullyAssignedToTags"
  "successfullyRemovedFromTags"
  "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags"
  "removeUserTag"
  "removeUserTagMessage"
  "tagDetails"
  "tagName"
  "tagUpdationSuccess"
  "tagRemovalSuccess"
  "noTagSelected"
)

# Check each key in other locale files
for key in "${keys[@]}"; do
  echo "Checking key: $key"
  rg -l "\"$key\":" "public/locales/{fr,hi,sp,zh}/translation.json"
done

Length of output: 4339


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check what locale files actually exist in the repository
echo "Checking available locale files..."
fd "translation.json" public/locales/

# Then let's examine the content of one of the new keys in all found translation files
echo -e "\nChecking content of 'noOneSelected' in all translation files:"
rg "noOneSelected" public/locales/

Length of output: 845


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for all the new keys in each translation file
keys=(
  "assignToTags"
  "removeFromTags"
  "assign"
  "remove"
  "successfullyAssignedToTags"
  "successfullyRemovedFromTags"
  "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags"
  "removeUserTag"
  "removeUserTagMessage"
  "tagDetails"
  "tagName"
  "tagUpdationSuccess"
  "tagRemovalSuccess"
  "noTagSelected"
)

for key in "${keys[@]}"; do
  echo "Checking key: $key"
  rg "\"$key\":" public/locales/
  echo "---"
done

Length of output: 11634

public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)

341-355: LGTM! The Spanish translations for tag management are well-implemented.

The new translations:

  • Accurately convey the meaning of tag management operations
  • Follow proper Spanish grammar and punctuation
  • Maintain consistency with existing translation patterns
  • Align well with the PR objectives for bulk tag operations
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1)

152-154: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Maintain consistent styling by using CSS modules

There is an inconsistency in how styles are applied to loaders.

Use CSS modules for all styling to keep the codebase consistent.

<div className="ms-5">
  <div className={styles.simpleLoader}>
    <div className={styles.spinner} />
  </div>
</div>

Ensure that similar loader components elsewhere in the code also use CSS modules.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1)

248-274: Validate currentTagId before making mutations

In both assignToSelectedTags and removeFromSelectedTags, currentTagId is used as a variable in the mutations. Ensure that currentTagId is not undefined or null before proceeding with the mutation to prevent potential errors.

Run the following script to check for usages where currentTagId might be undefined:

Also applies to: 275-301

src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (3)

183-183: Handle Potential Undefined Variables After Refetch

After calling userTagAssignedMembersRefetch() and orgUserTagsAncestorsRefetch(), ensure that any dependent variables are handled appropriately while the data is being re-fetched to prevent runtime errors.

Double-check that the component handles loading and error states correctly after refetching data.


179-179: Ensure Translation Key Exists and Is Correct

Verify that the translation key tagUpdateSuccess exists in the translation files and contains the correct message.

To check the translation keys, run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

Translation Key Exists and Is Correctly Used

The translation key tagUpdationSuccess (not tagUpdateSuccess) exists in all translation files (en, fr, sp, zh, hi) with appropriate translations. The code is using the correct key that matches the translation files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if 'tagUpdateSuccess' exists in translation files
# Expected Result: Lines containing 'tagUpdateSuccess' in translation files

fd -e json 'translation.json' | xargs rg '"tagUpdateSuccess"'

Length of output: 61


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for both 'tagUpdationSuccess' (as in the code) and 'tagUpdateSuccess' (as in the comment)
# Also search in common translation file locations and with different extensions
rg -i "tagUpdation|tagUpdate" --type json --type ts

Length of output: 1109


526-529: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Create showRemoveTagModal Function for Better Consistency

Similar to other modals, define a showRemoveTagModal function to handle the modal visibility state for removeTagModalIsOpen. This keeps the modal handling consistent across the component.

Suggested changes:

Define the function:

+  const showRemoveTagModal = (): void => {
+    setRemoveTagModalIsOpen(true);
+  };

   const toggleRemoveUserTagModal = (): void => {
     setRemoveTagModalIsOpen(!removeTagModalIsOpen);
   };

Update the onClick handler in lines 536-537:

   onClick={() => {
-    setRemoveTagModalIsOpen(true);
+    showRemoveTagModal();
   }}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
@meetulr meetulr requested a review from palisadoes as a code owner October 27, 2024 19:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.04%. Comparing base (d9d7269) to head (d8d657a).
Report is 9 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2362      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    97.99%   98.04%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          246      249       +3     
  Lines         7020     7197     +177     
  Branches      2026     2066      +40     
===========================================
+ Hits          6879     7056     +177     
  Misses         131      131              
  Partials        10       10              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 14

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (3)

69-75: Simplify tag expansion toggle logic

The conditional logic can be simplified by directly toggling the state.

-const handleTagClick = (): void => {
-  if (!expanded) {
-    setExpanded(true);
-  } else {
-    setExpanded(false); // collapse on second click
-  }
-};
+const handleTagClick = (): void => {
+  setExpanded(!expanded);
+};

168-173: Move inline styles to CSS modules

Consider moving inline styles to the CSS module for better maintainability.

-style={{
-  height: 300,
-  overflow: 'auto',
-}}
-className={`${styles.scrContainer}`}
+className={`${styles.scrContainer} ${styles.scrollableContainer}`}

Add to CSS module:

.scrollableContainer {
  height: 300px;
  overflow: auto;
}

187-196: Consider implementing virtualization for large tag lists

The current implementation loads all subtags into the DOM, which could impact performance with large lists. Consider using a virtualization library like react-window or react-virtualized to render only the visible items.

Example implementation with react-window:

import { FixedSizeList } from 'react-window';

const Row = ({ index, style }) => (
  <div style={style}>
    <TagNode
      tag={subTagsList[index]}
      checkedTags={checkedTags}
      toggleTagSelection={toggleTagSelection}
      t={t}
    />
  </div>
);

<FixedSizeList
  height={300}
  itemCount={subTagsList.length}
  itemSize={35}
  width="100%"
>
  {Row}
</FixedSizeList>
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (2)

162-186: Consider testing edge cases in tag selection.

While the basic selection/deselection flow is tested, consider adding tests for:

  • Maximum number of selectable tags
  • Selection behavior when parent tag is selected before child tags
test('Respects maximum selectable tags limit', async () => {
  renderTagActionsModal({ ...props[0], maxSelectableTags: 2 }, link);
  
  await wait();
  
  // Select first two tags
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('checkTag1'));
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('checkTag2'));
  
  // Try to select third tag
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('checkTag3'));
  
  // Verify only two tags are selected
  expect(screen.getAllByTestId(/^selectedTag/)).toHaveLength(2);
});

188-251: Add test for concurrent parent-child tag operations.

The current tests handle parent and child tag operations separately. Consider adding a test for concurrent operations.

test('Handles concurrent parent-child tag operations correctly', async () => {
  renderTagActionsModal(props[0], link);
  
  await wait();
  
  // Select parent tag first
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('checkTag1'));
  
  // Expand and select child tag
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('expandSubTags1'));
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('checkTagsubTag1'));
  
  // Verify both parent and child are selected
  expect(screen.getByTestId('selectedTag1')).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByTestId('selectedTagsubTag1')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (2)

191-277: LGTM: Comprehensive modal interaction tests

The new tests for modal interactions are well-structured and follow consistent patterns. They effectively verify the opening and closing of modals for all tag operations.

Consider grouping related modal tests using describe blocks for better organization:

describe('Modal interactions', () => {
  test('opens and closes the assignToTags modal', ...);
  test('opens and closes the removeFromTags modal', ...);
  // ... other modal tests
});

388-439: LGTM: Comprehensive tag operation tests with room for enhancement

The tests for editing and removing tags are well-implemented and cover the main success paths.

Consider adding these test cases to improve coverage:

  1. Edit tag validation:
test('shows error when editing tag with empty name', async () => {
  // ... setup code
  await userEvent.clear(screen.getByTestId('tagNameInput'));
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('editTagSubmitBtn'));
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(translations.tagNameRequired);
  });
});
  1. Remove tag cancellation:
test('cancels tag removal when clicking close', async () => {
  // ... setup code
  userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('removeUserTagModalCloseBtn'));
  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.queryByTestId('organizationTagsScreen')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)

349-356: Consider standardizing success message terminology.

The translations for tag management are generally good, but there's a minor inconsistency in the success message terminology:

  • tagUpdationSuccess uses "更新" (update)
  • tagRemovalSuccess uses "删除" (delete)

For better consistency across the application, consider using the same verb pattern.

Apply this diff to standardize the terminology:

-    "tagUpdationSuccess": "标签更新成功",
+    "tagUpdationSuccess": "标签已成功更新",
-    "tagRemovalSuccess": "标签删除成功",
+    "tagRemovalSuccess": "标签已成功删除",
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)

341-356: LGTM! The French translations for bulk tag operations are well-implemented.

The translations are complete, grammatically correct, and properly cover all the required functionality for bulk tag operations. The messages are clear and user-friendly.

Consider these minor improvements for consistency:

  • Line 344: Consider changing "Attribuer" to "Assigner" to match the terminology used in line 344 where "assign" is translated as "Assigner"
  • Line 350: Consider adding "tous" to emphasize "all" in "Cela supprimera tous les sous-tags" to match the English "This will remove all sub-tags"
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (1)

163-164: Improve naming for the edit mutation function

The variable name edit is a verb and might be confusing. Renaming it to updateUserTag will make the code more descriptive and improve readability.

Apply this diff to rename the mutation function:

- const [edit] = useMutation(UPDATE_USER_TAG);
+ const [updateUserTag] = useMutation(UPDATE_USER_TAG);

...

  const editTag = async (e: FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>): Promise<void> => {
    e.preventDefault();

    if (newTagName === currentTagName) {
      toast.info(t('changeNameToEdit'));
      return;
    }

    try {
-     const { data } = await edit({
+     const { data } = await updateUserTag({
        variables: {
          tagId: currentTagId,
          name: newTagName,
        },
      });

Also applies to: 181-186

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b4b913 and 6a79d51.

📒 Files selected for processing (12)
  • .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (2)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx:251-274
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T06:33:09.726Z
Learning: In `TagActions.test.tsx`, negative test cases for tag operations can be deferred and added later if necessary, according to the team's plan.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx:123-131
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T06:38:43.765Z
Learning: In `TagActions.test.tsx`, `link2` is the error link used to simulate errors, so the existing test cases sufficiently cover error handling.
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx:110-147
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T06:51:05.867Z
Learning: When handling the `useEffect` hooks for `addAncestorTagsData` and `removeAncestorTagsData` in `TagActions.tsx`, it's preferred to keep them separate to avoid confusion and enhance readability.
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:31:37.405Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
🔇 Additional comments (16)
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.test.tsx (2)

52-52: LGTM: Setup changes for new test cases

The additions to the test setup are appropriate:

  • Mock for toast.info needed for new test notifications
  • Simple merge strategy for getUserTag cache field

Also applies to: 63-66


Line range hint 1-439: Verify alignment with PR objectives

The test coverage aligns well with the PR objectives for bulk tag operations. However, let's verify the implementation of bulk operations in the actual component.

✅ Verification successful

Test coverage aligns with bulk tag operations implementation

The test coverage in ManageTag.test.tsx correctly verifies the bulk tag operations functionality. The implementation is confirmed by:

  1. Presence of bulk operation mutations:

    • AssignToUserTags for assigning members to multiple tags
    • RemoveFromUserTags for removing members from multiple tags
  2. Component implementation includes:

    • Bulk operation UI controls (assignToTags, removeFromTags)
    • Modal state management for bulk actions
    • Proper type definitions (TagActionType)

The test suite comprehensively covers both the UI interactions and the expected outcomes of these bulk operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify bulk operations implementation in ManageTag component

# Check for bulk operation methods in the component
echo "Searching for bulk operation methods in ManageTag component..."
rg -A 5 "assignToTags|removeFromTags" "src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx"

# Verify GraphQL mutations for bulk operations
echo "Checking GraphQL mutations for bulk operations..."
rg -A 5 "mutation.*Tag.*\(" "src/graphql/mutations/tag.ts"

Length of output: 1849


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation more thoroughly

# Check for GraphQL mutations in any file
echo "Searching for GraphQL mutations related to tags..."
rg -A 5 "mutation.*Tag" --type ts

# Check for the TagActionsModal component
echo "Checking TagActionsModal implementation..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "TagActionsModal" --exec cat {}

# Check for bulk operation types
echo "Checking for TagActionType definition..."
rg "type.*TagActionType"

Length of output: 3378

src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (4)

1-8: LGTM: Imports are well-organized.

The imports are properly structured and include all necessary GraphQL operations and constants.


9-222: LGTM: Well-structured pagination mock data.

The mock data for organization tags follows proper GraphQL pagination patterns with:

  • Consistent cursor implementation
  • Accurate totalCount matching the actual number of tags
  • Proper page info with correct hasNextPage/hasPreviousPage flags

421-453: LGTM: Mutation mocks are properly structured.

The mock responses for tag assignment and removal operations are minimal yet sufficient for testing purposes.


455-466: **** A previous review comment already addresses the need to improve error mock specificity.

public/locales/zh/translation.json (2)

341-347: LGTM! Bulk tag operation translations are clear and consistent.

The translations for bulk tag operations are well-structured and accurately convey the intended functionality, aligning with the PR objectives for implementing bulk tag operations.


348-348: LGTM! Error handling translation is appropriate.

The error message translation for loading organization tags is clear and user-friendly.

public/locales/en/translation.json (3)

341-347: LGTM: New translations for bulk tag operations are clear and consistent.

The new translation keys for bulk tag operations are well-structured and provide clear, user-friendly messages:

  • Appropriate action verbs ("Assign", "Remove")
  • Clear success messages
  • Consistent naming convention

348-348: LGTM: Error message follows established pattern.

The error message for loading organization tags follows the existing error message pattern in the codebase and provides clear feedback to users.


351-356: LGTM: Tag management UI translations are comprehensive.

The new translations for tag management UI elements are complete and follow consistent patterns:

  • Clear labels for tag details
  • Appropriate validation messages
  • Helpful user feedback for edit operations
public/locales/hi/translation.json (2)

341-348: LGTM! New translations for bulk tag operations are well-structured.

The translations are clear, consistent with the application's style, and accurately convey the functionality in Hindi. They properly support the new bulk tag operations feature.


349-356: LGTM! Updated translations for tag management are comprehensive.

The translations are well-written and include important details like the sub-tag removal warning in the confirmation message. The translations maintain consistency with the existing UI text style.

public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)

341-356: Well-structured Spanish translations for tag management functionality.

The new translations are properly localized to Spanish while maintaining consistency with the application's terminology. The translations effectively cover all aspects of the bulk tag operations feature, including:

  • Selection states ("Nadie seleccionado")
  • Action buttons ("Asignar", "Eliminar")
  • Success messages ("Asignado a etiquetas con éxito")
  • Error states ("Error al cargar las etiquetas")
  • Confirmation dialogs ("¿Desea eliminar esta etiqueta?")
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (2)

154-157: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the setter function name in removeAncestorTags

Update setUnheckedTagId to setUncheckedTagId.

Apply this diff:

 const removeAncestorTags = (tagId: string): void => {
-  setUnheckedTagId(tagId);
+  setUncheckedTagId(tagId);
   setCheckedTagId(null);
 };

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


90-90: ⚠️ Potential issue

Typo in setter function name

There is a typo in the state setter function setUnheckedTagId. It should be setUncheckedTagId to match the state variable uncheckedTagId.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

-const [uncheckedTagId, setUnheckedTagId] = useState<string | null>(null);
+const [uncheckedTagId, setUncheckedTagId] = useState<string | null>(null);

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)

9-453: Standardize tag ID format across mock data.

The mock data uses inconsistent ID formats:

  • Parent tags use numeric IDs ('1', '2', etc.)
  • Subtags use prefixed IDs ('subTag1', 'subTag2', etc.)

While this works functionally, standardizing the ID format would improve maintainability and make tests more predictable.

Consider using one of these consistent formats:

- _id: '1',
+ _id: 'tag1',  // Option 1: All tags use 'tag' prefix
+ _id: '001',   // Option 2: All tags use padded numbers

The pagination implementation is well structured.

The cursor-based pagination is correctly implemented with proper page info and consistent total counts. The mutation mocks for assigning and removing tags are also well structured.

src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2)

70-72: Consider renaming modal handlers for consistency

The function toggleRemoveUserTagModal toggles the state of removeTagModalIsOpen. For consistency with other modal handlers and to better reflect its purpose, consider renaming it to toggleRemoveTagModal.

-const toggleRemoveUserTagModal = (): void => {
+const toggleRemoveTagModal = (): void => {
   setRemoveTagModalIsOpen(!removeTagModalIsOpen);
 };

189-189: Improve success message text

The term 'Updation' in tagUpdationSuccess is not standard English. Consider using 'Update' instead.

-toast.success(t('tagUpdationSuccess'));
+toast.success(t('tagUpdateSuccess'));
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)

342-343: Consider standardizing the term "tag" vs "étiquette".

For consistency, consider using either "tag" or "étiquette" throughout the translations. Currently, some messages use "tag" while others use "étiquette". Standardizing the terminology would improve the user experience.

Example of current mixed usage:

  • "assignToTags": "Attribuer aux tags"
  • "tagUpdationSuccess": "Étiquette mise à jour avec succès"

Also applies to: 346-347

public/locales/sp/translation.json (3)

350-350: Clarify the tag deletion consequences message

The current message "¿Desea eliminar esta etiqueta? Esto eliminará todas las subetiquetas y todas las asociaciones." could be clearer about what "associations" means.

Consider this more explicit translation:

-    "removeUserTagMessage": "¿Desea eliminar esta etiqueta? Esto eliminará todas las subetiquetas y todas las asociaciones.",
+    "removeUserTagMessage": "¿Desea eliminar esta etiqueta? Esto eliminará todas las subetiquetas y todas las asignaciones de usuarios.",

356-356: Improve clarity of the edit action message

The message "Cambia el nombre para hacer una actualización" is technically correct but could be more natural in Spanish.

Consider this more natural phrasing:

-    "changeNameToEdit": "Cambia el nombre para hacer una actualización",
+    "changeNameToEdit": "Modifica el nombre para guardar los cambios",

342-345: Enhance natural language flow for tag actions

The translations are correct but could be more idiomatic in Spanish.

Consider these more natural translations:

-    "assignToTags": "Asignar a etiquetas",
-    "removeFromTags": "Eliminar de etiquetas",
-    "assign": "Asignar",
-    "remove": "Eliminar",
+    "assignToTags": "Asignar a las etiquetas",
+    "removeFromTags": "Quitar de las etiquetas",
+    "assign": "Asignar",
+    "remove": "Quitar",
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (4)

404-404: Remove unnecessary value attribute from the <Button> component

The value attribute is not standard for a <Button> component from React Bootstrap and doesn't affect its behavior. Removing it cleans up the code and avoids any confusion.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary attribute:

-  <Button type="submit" value="add" data-testid="tagActionSubmitBtn">
+  <Button type="submit" data-testid="tagActionSubmitBtn">

85-87: Ensure userTagsList has a default value to prevent rendering issues

If orgUserTagsData is undefined, userTagsList will also be undefined, which could lead to rendering issues. Providing a default empty array ensures the component handles the absence of data gracefully.

Apply this diff to provide a default value:

 const userTagsList = orgUserTagsData?.organizations[0]?.userTags.edges.map(
   (edge) => edge.node,
- ) ;
+ ) || [];

108-108: Specify the generic types for ancestorTagsDataMap

The ancestorTagsDataMap state is initialized without specifying the types for its keys and values. Providing explicit types enhances type safety and code readability.

Update the state initialization to include type parameters:

- const [ancestorTagsDataMap, setAncestorTagsDataMap] = useState(new Map());
+ const [ancestorTagsDataMap, setAncestorTagsDataMap] = useState<Map<string, number>>(new Map<string, number>());

77-83: Include error handling in the useQuery hook for ORGANIZATION_USER_TAGS_LIST

Adding an onError option to your useQuery hook helps manage errors by providing user feedback and logging errors for debugging.

Apply this diff to enhance error handling:

 } = useQuery(ORGANIZATION_USER_TAGS_LIST, {
   variables: {
     id: orgId,
     first: TAGS_QUERY_LIMIT,
   },
   skip: !assignToTagsModalIsOpen,
+  onError: (error) => {
+    toast.error(t('failedToLoadUserTags'));
+    console.error(error.message);
+  },
 });

Ensure that the key 'failedToLoadUserTags' is added to your translation files with an appropriate message.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a79d51 and 9bc25d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (10 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • public/locales/zh/translation.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx:110-147
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T06:51:05.867Z
Learning: When handling the `useEffect` hooks for `addAncestorTagsData` and `removeAncestorTagsData` in `TagActions.tsx`, it's preferred to keep them separate to avoid confusion and enhance readability.
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:31:37.405Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1)

1-21: LGTM! Well-structured imports and interface definition.

The imports are organized logically, and the interface is properly documented with clear type definitions.

src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.

The imports are properly organized by type and all imported entities are used in the mock data.


455-466: LGTM! Error mock structure is correct.

The error mock follows the correct structure for GraphQL error responses.

Note: A previous review already suggested improving error message specificity.

src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx (2)

203-220: LGTM! Well-implemented tag removal functionality

The implementation includes proper error handling, success feedback, and navigation after successful removal.


512-548: LGTM! Well-structured UI components

The tag action buttons are well-organized with consistent styling, proper event handlers, and test IDs.

public/locales/en/translation.json (2)

341-348: LGTM! Clear and consistent messages for bulk tag operations.

The new messages effectively support the bulk tag operations feature with clear labels and success notifications.


351-360: LGTM! Clear and helpful UI messages for tag management.

The messages provide clear guidance for tag management operations.

public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)

341-360: LGTM! Translations properly support bulk tag operations.

The new Hindi translations for the tag management section are well-structured and comprehensive, covering all necessary messages for bulk tag operations including:

  • Bulk action labels (assignToTags, removeFromTags)
  • Success messages for bulk operations
  • Error handling messages
  • UI element labels for tag details and management
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)

341-360: LGTM! Translations align well with bulk tag operations feature.

The added French translations comprehensively cover all aspects of the bulk tag operations functionality, including:

  • Core operations (assign/remove tags)
  • Success/error messages
  • UI elements and confirmations

src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
public/locales/en/translation.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActions.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (2)

23-25: Enhance component documentation

The current documentation is too brief. Consider adding more details about:

  • The component's role in the tag management system
  • The expandable/collapsible behavior
  • The relationship with parent/child tags

162-162: Improve the expanded state check

The current check expanded && subTagsList?.length could evaluate to 0, which is falsy. Use an explicit length comparison for clarity.

-{expanded && subTagsList?.length && (
+{expanded && subTagsList && subTagsList.length > 0 && (
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 926f766 and d3e91ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (2)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx:162-199
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T08:44:48.343Z
Learning: If there are no child tags for a tag, then the option to expand it is not provided.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx:129-137
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T08:21:01.364Z
Learning: When setting the aria-label for the checkbox in `TagNode.tsx`, it's acceptable to use `t('selectTag')` without including the tag name.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1)

1-21: LGTM! Well-structured imports and interface definition.

The imports are organized logically, and the interface is properly documented with TypeScript types.

src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (2)

17-22: Consider enhancing type definitions and documentation

The interface could benefit from more specific typing for the translation function and additional documentation about the component's purpose.

 interface InterfaceTagNodeProps {
   tag: InterfaceTagData;
   checkedTags: Set<string>;
   toggleTagSelection: (tag: InterfaceTagData, isSelected: boolean) => void;
-  t: (key: string) => string;
+  t: (key: string, options?: Record<string, unknown>) => string;
 }

167-167: Consider wrapping tag name in a semantic element

The tag name could benefit from being wrapped in a semantic element for better accessibility and styling control.

-        {tag.name}
+        <span className={styles.tagName}>{tag.name}</span>
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)

341-347: Core tag operation messages need punctuation consistency.

The translation quality is good, but there's inconsistency in punctuation usage. Some messages end with periods while others don't.

Apply this diff to maintain consistency:

-    "noOneSelected": "Personne sélectionnée",
+    "noOneSelected": "Personne sélectionnée.",
-    "assignToTags": "Attribuer aux tags",
+    "assignToTags": "Attribuer aux tags.",
-    "removeFromTags": "Retirer des tags",
+    "removeFromTags": "Retirer des tags.",
-    "assign": "Attribuer",
+    "assign": "Attribuer.",
-    "remove": "Retirer",
+    "remove": "Retirer.",
     "successfullyAssignedToTags": "Attribué aux tags avec succès",
     "successfullyRemovedFromTags": "Retiré des tags avec succès"
public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)

350-362: Consider these translation improvements for better clarity.

While the translations are functional, consider these improvements for more natural Spanish phrasing:

-    "tagDetails": "Detalles de la etiqueta",
+    "tagDetails": "Información de la etiqueta",
-    "changeNameToEdit": "Cambia el nombre para hacer una actualización",
+    "changeNameToEdit": "Modifica el nombre para actualizar",
-    "tagNamePlaceholder": "Escribe el nombre de la etiqueta",
+    "tagNamePlaceholder": "Ingresa el nombre de la etiqueta",

These suggestions:

  1. Use "Información" instead of "Detalles" for a more natural Spanish term
  2. Simplify the edit message while maintaining the same meaning
  3. Use "Ingresa" which is more commonly used in Spanish UI elements
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3e91ac and 2a49ea0.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/components/TagActions/TagActions.test.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (1)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T19:31:37.405Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (3)
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx:79-109
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T09:10:06.112Z
Learning: In the `TagNode` component at `src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx`, the infinite scroll component efficiently manages the calls to `loadMoreSubTags`, preventing multiple simultaneous requests.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx:162-199
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T08:44:48.343Z
Learning: If there are no child tags for a tag, then the option to expand it is not provided.
Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2362
File: src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx:129-137
Timestamp: 2024-10-28T08:21:01.364Z
Learning: When setting the aria-label for the checkbox in `TagNode.tsx`, it's acceptable to use `t('selectTag')` without including the tag name.
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/components/TagActions/TagNode.tsx (2)

67-78: Well-implemented error handling!

The error UI is user-friendly and follows good practices:

  • Clear visual indication with warning icon
  • Translated error message
  • Proper styling and layout

84-124: Well-structured event handlers and data loading logic!

The implementation is clean and efficient:

  • Concise event handlers
  • Proper parent-child communication
  • Efficient infinite scroll integration
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.

The imports are logically grouped and all are utilized in the mock data.


455-533: LGTM! Well-structured error mocks.

The error mocks provide:

  • Specific and descriptive error messages
  • Consistent structure with success scenarios
  • Good coverage of error cases for both organization tags and subtags queries
public/locales/zh/translation.json (3)

341-347: LGTM: Tag operation translations are clear and consistent.

The translations for bulk tag operations are well-structured and accurately convey their purpose in Chinese:

  • "noOneSelected": "未选择任何人" (No one selected)
  • "assignToTags": "分配到标签" (Assign to tags)
  • "removeFromTags": "从标签中移除" (Remove from tags)
  • "successfullyAssignedToTags": "成功分配到标签" (Successfully assigned to tags)
  • "successfullyRemovedFromTags": "成功从标签中移除" (Successfully removed from tags)

348-349: LGTM: Error messages are clear and follow standard patterns.

The error message translations are consistent with other error messages in the file and clearly communicate the issue to users:

  • "errorOccurredWhileLoadingOrganizationUserTags": "加载组织标签时出错"
  • "errorOccurredWhileLoadingSubTags": "加载子标签时发生错误"

350-362: LGTM: Tag management translations are comprehensive.

The translations for tag management functionality are complete and maintain consistency with existing UI patterns:

  • Tag removal confirmations
  • Tag detail views
  • Tag selection and editing
  • UI actions (collapse/expand)
public/locales/en/translation.json (4)

341-347: LGTM! Translation keys for bulk operations are well-structured.

The new translation keys effectively support the bulk tag operations feature with clear and consistent messaging.


348-349: LGTM! Error messages are clear and consistent.

The error messages effectively communicate loading failures for organization tags and subtags.


352-362: LGTM! Tag management messages provide clear user guidance.

The translation keys effectively support tag management operations with clear labels and instructions.


341-362: Verify translations in other language files.

The English translations for bulk tag operations are complete. Ensure that corresponding translations are added to other language files (fr, hi, sp, zh) to maintain consistency across all supported languages.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try to find the actual translation files first since the pattern matching didn't work.


Now that I have the correct paths, let me check for the translations in all language files.


All translations for bulk tag operations are present and complete

The verification shows that all required translation keys for bulk tag operations (noOneSelected, assignToTags, removeFromTags, successfullyAssignedToTags, successfullyRemovedFromTags) are present and properly translated in all language files (fr, hi, sp, zh). Each translation appears to be meaningful and contextually appropriate for its respective language.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if bulk tag operation keys exist in all language files
# Test: Search for bulk operation keys in other language files
for key in "noOneSelected" "assignToTags" "removeFromTags" "successfullyAssignedToTags" "successfullyRemovedFromTags"; do
  echo "Checking translations for: $key"
  rg "\"$key\":" "public/locales/(fr|hi|sp|zh)/translation.json"
done

Length of output: 1925


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all translation.json files in the repository
fd translation.json

Length of output: 196


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for bulk operation keys in all non-English translation files
for key in "noOneSelected" "assignToTags" "removeFromTags" "successfullyAssignedToTags" "successfullyRemovedFromTags"; do
  echo "=== Checking translations for: $key ==="
  for lang in fr hi sp zh; do
    echo "Language: $lang"
    rg "\"$key\":" "public/locales/$lang/translation.json" -A 1
  done
  echo
done

Length of output: 5865

public/locales/hi/translation.json (3)

341-362: Well-structured translations for bulk tag operations!

The Hindi translations for bulk tag operations are accurate, consistent, and properly convey the intended functionality. The translations maintain proper grammar and natural language flow.


Line range hint 1-1000: Valid JSON structure with proper nesting!

The file maintains a valid JSON structure with proper nesting of translations under their respective sections. All key-value pairs are correctly formatted.


341-362: Translations align perfectly with PR objectives!

The added translations provide comprehensive language support for the bulk tag operations feature, including:

  • Assigning and removing tags
  • Success messages for bulk operations
  • Error handling messages
  • UI element labels
public/locales/fr/translation.json (2)

348-349: Error messages are properly translated.

The error messages are well translated and maintain consistency with the rest of the application's error message format.


341-362: Translations fully support bulk tag operations feature.

The translations provide comprehensive coverage for the bulk tag operations functionality described in the PR objectives, including:

  • Bulk assignment and removal messages
  • Error handling
  • Tag selection and management UI elements
public/locales/sp/translation.json (2)

341-345: LGTM! UI element translations are clear and consistent.

The translations for tag assignment and removal operations maintain consistency with the application's Spanish localization style.


346-349: LGTM! Operation messages are well translated.

The success and error messages are clearly translated and follow Spanish language conventions.

src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TagActions/TagActionsMocks.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
public/locales/fr/translation.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
@meetulr
Copy link
Contributor Author

meetulr commented Oct 28, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a49ea0 and 052aead.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
public/locales/fr/translation.json (3)

344-347: LGTM! Action and success message translations are well structured.

The translations for actions and success messages are grammatically correct and maintain a consistent tone.


348-349: LGTM! Error messages are properly translated.

The error message translations are clear and follow French grammar rules.


350-362: Fix remaining terminology inconsistencies.

Some UI elements still use "tag" instead of "étiquette".

This issue was previously identified in an earlier review. The same fix needs to be applied to maintain consistency throughout the translations.

public/locales/fr/translation.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@meetulr When you use the review command, CodeRabbit reviews the commits that have not been reviewed yet and skips the ones that have already been reviewed. It is designed to be an incremental review system. If you'd like me to review all the commits again, please let me know.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Oct 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@beingnoble03 beingnoble03 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just had a small doubt @meetulr for this one.

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Count number of lines
run: |
chmod +x ./.github/workflows/countline.py
./.github/workflows/countline.py --lines 600 --exclude_files src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx src/GraphQl/Mutations/mutations.ts src/components/EventListCard/EventListCardModals.tsx
./.github/workflows/countline.py --lines 600 --exclude_files src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx src/GraphQl/Queries/Queries.ts src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx src/GraphQl/Mutations/mutations.ts src/components/EventListCard/EventListCardModals.tsx src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't seem like we should ignore these files? Is this future plan to restrict it to 600 lines?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@meetulr meetulr Oct 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this check was added in the months before this gsoc... I'm not sure about how 600 lines was decided upon. This could be discussed and changed as the app grows and includes more features that would cause files to be larger than 600 lines. Still I'll try to reduce this file's size in the upcoming PR for refactoring...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants