Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for bandit instead plug_cowboy #144

Open
Munksgaard opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Support for bandit instead plug_cowboy #144

Munksgaard opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Munksgaard
Copy link

Would it be possible to add support for using bandit instead of plug_cowboy for the http server? I've transitioned most of my projects to using bandit instead of cowboy, and bypass is the last thing still dragging cowboy with it as a dependency.

Perhaps we could use some form of adapter approach, like in Phoenix?

@claytongentry
Copy link

I built Lasso to do this. Would love if Bypass supported it. I gladly would move back over.

fishtreesugar added a commit to fishtreesugar/bypass that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2024
`bypass` only utilizes a small part of the `ranch` API; we could simply use `:gen_tcp` directly.

And this changes might lower the dependency footprint when `bypass` going to support different HTTP server: PSPDFKit-labs#144
IceDragon200 pushed a commit to IceDragon200/bypass that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
`bypass` only utilizes a small part of the `ranch` API; we could simply use `:gen_tcp` directly.

And this changes might lower the dependency footprint when `bypass` going to support different HTTP server: PSPDFKit-labs#144
fishtreesugar added a commit to fishtreesugar/bypass that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2024
`bypass` only utilizes a small part of the `ranch` API; we could simply use `:gen_tcp` directly.

And this changes might lower the dependency footprint when `bypass` going to support different HTTP server: PSPDFKit-labs#144
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants