Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmetic changes to Calculator.reform_documentation function #1600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2017
Merged

Cosmetic changes to Calculator.reform_documentation function #1600

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2017

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request rearranges the pylint: disable=... comments in the Calculator.reform_documentation function and add some line spacing to (hopefully) make the function code easier to follow.

There are no changes in the function's logic or results.

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

MattHJensen commented Oct 20, 2017

+1

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1600 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1600   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%    100%           
======================================
  Files          37      37           
  Lines        2767    2767           
======================================
  Hits         2767    2767
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
taxcalc/calculate.py 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 25b18dd...139270e. Read the comment docs.

@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit 6281258 into PSLmodels:master Oct 20, 2017
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the refactor-reform-doc branch October 20, 2017 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants