Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which expanded_income to use in TaxBrain/dropq difference table bins? #1540

Closed
martinholmer opened this issue Sep 1, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

In many reforms, expanded_income is unchanged from the current-law baseline. But in situations where there is a difference, a question arises about how to classify filing units in expanded_income bins. Should we use the baseline expanded_income or should we use the reform expanded_income?

@MattHJensen @feenberg @Amy-Xu @andersonfrailey @hdoupe @GoFroggyRun @brittainhard @talumbau

@Amy-Xu
Copy link
Member

Amy-Xu commented Sep 1, 2017

It seems to me that we should use baseline expanded_income? That was the case with AGI when it's used as a bin classifier -- no matter how AGI is changed in the reform, always use the baseline AGI.

@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Amy-Xu said:

It seems to me that we should use baseline expanded_income? That was the case with AGI when it's used as a bin classifier -- no matter how AGI is changed in the reform, always use the baseline AGI.

OK, but I'm unsure what you're referring to when you talks about AGI being "used as a bin classifier".
Where in Tax-Calculator do we use AGI as a bin classifier?

@feenberg
Copy link
Contributor

feenberg commented Sep 2, 2017 via email

@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems as if @Amy-Xu and @feenberg favor using baseline expanded income or baseline AGI (if that is the income measure) to classify filing units in bins in difference tables. Anybody else want to state a view?

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

I am in agreement w @Amy-Xu and @feenberg that we should use the baseline income measure for tabbing distribution tables. Otherwise a progressive reform that also moves people up the income-measure distribution might look regressive.

@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks to everyone who responded to my question in issue #1540.
The answers were consistent and that answer has been incorporated into pull request #1537.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants