Do not fail because of Linkcheck, add ignored links

[Zeitsperre]

Pull Request Checklist:

• This PR addresses an already opened issue (for bug fixes / features)
  • This PR fixes #xyz
• (If applicable) Documentation has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features).
• (If applicable) Tests have been added.
• This PR does not seem to break the templates.
• CHANGES.rst has been updated (with summary of main changes).
  • Link to issue (:issue:number) and pull request (:pull:number) has been added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Added some links to ignore
• Configured ReadTheDocs to not fail build if Linkcheck step fails
• Moved notebooks into an "Examples" section

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

[juliettelavoie]

ah! thanks !

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[Zeitsperre]

@aulemahal

It looks like your latest notebook is failing. Shall I leave the fix up to you here?

[aulemahal]

Woups, this notebook is not supposed to run. I'll deactivate it.

I kept it in the repo to show how the results were obtained, and to make it easy to manually update the timeseries, periodically. But it makes reference to data inside ouranos and this link for NOAA's dataset changes each month.

[aulemahal]

@Zeitsperre I added the "NO_COLOR" env var to the admin panel of RTD, should make the online output easier to read!

Otherwise, the only warning I can find in the last build is coming from Clisops... Or I missed something else ?

[Zeitsperre]

@aulemahal

The final warning in the docs build is coming from the fact that the notebook is not explicitly ignored. (UserWarnings and other Python-specific warnings don't count). I'm on it.

[aulemahal]

Oh I see! Thanks!

[Zeitsperre]

Errors are finally all addressed. I've restructured the notebooks for flow; If this isn't what we want, I can revert the changes.

[aulemahal]

I approve this.