fix(robot-server): exempt /logs and RPC from version header requirement

[mcous]

Overview

This PR fixes an unreleased bug with robot logs downloads caused by #7632. It exempts certain endpoints (/logs included) to fix robot logs downloading.

Closes #7924.

Changelog

• fix(robot-server): exempt /logs and RPC from version header requirement

Review requests

• Can download logs with this build installed on a robot

Risk assessment

Low. Revert of bad change

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7927 (5177290) into release_4.4.0 (3563656) will increase coverage by 12.74%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release_4.4.0    #7927       +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage          80.70%   93.44%   +12.74%     
==================================================
  Files                223      130       -93     
  Lines              16530     5083    -11447     
==================================================
- Hits               13340     4750     -8590     
+ Misses              3190      333     -2857     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
robot-server/robot_server/app.py	91.42% <100.00%> (ø)
robot-server/robot_server/router.py	93.10% <100.00%> (ø)
...er/robot_server/service/legacy/routers/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
opentrons/protocol_engine/clients/__init__.py
opentrons/protocols/execution/json_dispatchers.py
opentrons/drivers/serial_communication.py
opentrons/__init__.py
opentrons/commands/types.py
opentrons/hardware_control/emulation/tempdeck.py
opentrons/tools/args_handler.py
... and 346 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3563656...5177290. Read the comment docs.

[SyntaxColoring]

I can't leave a comment in the right place because GitHub is dumb, but:

Can we leave a comment on the router.include_router(router=legacy_routes, ...) above, to say that it's deliberately excluded from check_version_header? (You've already done this for the sub-routers within legacy_routes.)

[mcous]

That feels a little inaccurate to me, since many of the legacy_routesare very much not excluded from the header check requirement

[SyntaxColoring]

Confirmed with the reproduction steps in #7924 that this fixes that bug.

Other than my optional nitpick above, LGTM. 🎉

[nusrat813]

Tested, LGTM