Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): use number for timeout minutes #7313

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2021

Conversation

shlokamin
Copy link
Member

@shlokamin shlokamin commented Feb 10, 2021

Overview

CI is broken because the value associated with timeout-minutes is not being recognized. I think it's supposed to be a number, so I've updated the values accordingly.

Changelog

  • Use number for timeout-minutes in gh workflows

Risk assessment

Low

@shlokamin shlokamin requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2021 17:10
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (edge@2e72e39). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge    #7313   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   76.55%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      177           
  Lines           ?    15375           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    11771           
  Misses          ?     3604           
  Partials        ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2e72e39...8347a53. Read the comment docs.

@shlokamin shlokamin merged commit c553af1 into edge Feb 10, 2021
@mcous mcous deleted the chore_use-numbers-for-timeouts branch June 10, 2022 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants