Feat(shared-data): add the p200_96 #17079
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
<!-- Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing Guide: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams, pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub markdown, see: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out the sections below to the best of your ability! --> Add all of the string constants for the pipette type, and then update some of the loading/checking of pipette types that were explicitly checking only the 1000ul version of the 96. <!-- Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources. --> <!-- Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that support your testing. --> <!-- List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking changes. --> <!-- - What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to merge? - Ask questions. --> <!-- - Indicate the level of attention this PR needs. - Provide context to guide reviewers. - Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects. - Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your change may affect some other part of the system. - For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the behavior of labware calibration. - How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's risks and the risk of future regressions? - Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is enough. -->
<!-- Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing Guide: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams, pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub markdown, see: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out the sections below to the best of your ability! --> Add 200ul pipette definitions to shared data <!-- Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources. --> <!-- Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that support your testing. --> <!-- List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking changes. --> <!-- - What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to merge? - Ask questions. --> This will not work out of the box until we get aspirate/dispense pipette functions from the factory. <!-- - Indicate the level of attention this PR needs. - Provide context to guide reviewers. - Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects. - Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your change may affect some other part of the system. - For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the behavior of labware calibration. - How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's risks and the risk of future regressions? - Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is enough. -->
…nd photometric tests (#16774) <!-- Thanks for taking the time to open a Pull Request (PR)! Please make sure you've read the "Opening Pull Requests" section of our Contributing Guide: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/blob/edge/CONTRIBUTING.md#opening-pull-requests GitHub provides robust markdown to format your PR. Links, diagrams, pictures, and videos along with text formatting make it possible to create a rich and informative PR. For more information on GitHub markdown, see: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/getting-started-with-writing-and-formatting-on-github/basic-writing-and-formatting-syntax To ensure your code is reviewed quickly and thoroughly, please fill out the sections below to the best of your ability! --> Adds the 200ul pipette into the scripts and currently uses the same settings as the other 96 but can now go through the normal tuning process. <!-- Describe your PR at a high level. State acceptance criteria and how this PR fits into other work. Link issues, PRs, and other relevant resources. --> <!-- Describe your testing of the PR. Emphasize testing not reflected in the code. Attach protocols, logs, screenshots and any other assets that support your testing. --> <!-- List changes introduced by this PR considering future developers and the end user. Give careful thought and clear documentation to breaking changes. --> <!-- - What do you need from reviewers to feel confident this PR is ready to merge? - Ask questions. --> <!-- - Indicate the level of attention this PR needs. - Provide context to guide reviewers. - Discuss trade-offs, coupling, and side effects. - Look for the possibility, even if you think it's small, that your change may affect some other part of the system. - For instance, changing return tip behavior may also change the behavior of labware calibration. - How do your unit tests and on hands on testing mitigate this PR's risks and the risk of future regressions? - Especially in high risk PRs, explain how you know your testing is enough. -->
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## edge #17079 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 92.43% 79.21% -13.23%
===========================================
Files 77 120 +43
Lines 1283 4533 +3250
===========================================
+ Hits 1186 3591 +2405
- Misses 97 942 +845
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
This reverts commit 13c778b.
|
Making a new branch with a cleaner history |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Test Plan and Hands on Testing
Changelog
Review requests
Risk assessment