Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(shared-data, api): Add evo tips definition and restrictions on loading #16710

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: edge
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Laura-Danielle
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Add evo tips definition but as a labware so that liquid handling actions can happen in the 'labware'.

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

Need to check that the stackup works as expected

Changelog

  • Add evo tips definition
  • Add stacking component to nest deepwell plate
  • Add error check for the evo tips definition so that it is not accidentally loaded onto the deck

Review requests

Check that the labware role makes sense and the stacking part.

Risk assessment

Low. Adding a new labware.

@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested review from a team as code owners November 6, 2024 20:28
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle force-pushed the PLAT-350-add-evo-tips-tiprack branch from 66da179 to c87dde7 Compare December 8, 2024 16:48
Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The verification logic wants to be in the engine but other than that looks good.

@@ -363,6 +372,27 @@ def ensure_definition_is_labware(definition: LabwareDefinition) -> None:
)


def ensure_labware_is_loadable(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This wants to be in the engine I reckon

@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle force-pushed the PLAT-350-add-evo-tips-tiprack branch from bc3405e to e01dcbe Compare December 12, 2024 18:54
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 05:34
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested review from smb2268 and sfoster1 and removed request for a team December 13, 2024 05:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.21%. Comparing base (906d841) to head (5608ebd).
Report is 29 commits behind head on edge.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             edge   #16710       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   92.43%   79.21%   -13.23%     
===========================================
  Files          77      120       +43     
  Lines        1283     4533     +3250     
===========================================
+ Hits         1186     3591     +2405     
- Misses         97      942      +845     
Flag Coverage Δ
g-code-testing 92.43% <ø> (ø)
shared-data 74.00% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 43 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants