Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(app): fix robotType condition for overflow menu in protocol card #16079

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

koji
Copy link
Contributor

@koji koji commented Aug 21, 2024

Overview

fix robotType condition for overflow menu in protocol card since robotType is not null even when a protocol gets failed.
the issue was checking Array error size and robotType was null when an OT-2 protocol was failed.
then overflow menu displays send to robot.

Screen.Recording.2024-08-21.at.1.22.45.PM.mov

protocol that is attached to the ticket
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 6 57 45 PM

close RQA-3066

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

check the following cases

  • valid OT-2 protocol -> not display send to flex
  • invalid OT-2 protocol -> not display send to flex
  • valid Flex protocol -> display send to flex
  • invalid Flex protocol -> display send to flex
  • test the protocol Josh attached

Changelog

Review requests

Risk assessment

low

fix robotType condition for overflow menu in protocol card

close RQA-3066
@koji koji requested review from ncdiehl11, mjhuff and jerader August 21, 2024 04:36
@koji koji marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2024 04:36
@koji koji requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2024 04:36
Copy link
Member

@sfoster1 sfoster1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Glad to separate this logic.

@koji koji merged commit dbb1353 into chore_release-8.0.0 Aug 22, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants